Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We're looking to buy a new lightweight toddler pushchair. We've narrowed it down to this two, having been given an extremely ancient Triumph that our daughter loves but is very much on its last legs.


Apart from the Triumph's ability to recline, is there anything that justifies the higher price for the Triumph? Any experiences of either pram welcome.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/30240-maclaren-volo-v-triumph/
Share on other sites

I use an old volo and think it is great. If I am going out by myself on public transport, especially when i know there will be steps, I take the volo without extras eg. no hood/raincover (weather permitting), so I can sling it over one shoulder and carry baby in the other arm, or if the child is slightly older you could get them to walk the steps holding their hand. Also, on Southeastern trains the volo fits on the overhead luggage rack. Without extras attached it is just 3.6kg I think. It is a great buggy, I am sure the truimph is too, just depends if you really want the recline.
I would say it depends on what you are using the pushchair for, if it is going to be your only or main push chair then I am not sure the volo is the best option, it is a bit too lightweight, small wheels, quite low to push. I agree it is brilliant if you are going in to London for the day, taking to the airport or chucking in the back of the car but for going on a longer walk or taking over slightly uneven ground it is pretty useless. We have also had the quest which I think is a better option for when they are a bit bigger, easy enough to commute with but a bit more sturdy, easier to push and suitable for a slightly bigger child, our eldest got too big for the volo when she was quite young, though she is pretty big for her age.

Interesting replies, thanks.


My daughter is a tall 22 month old. We're having another baby in two months. We have a Bee Plus which I love but my daughter seems to hate now. The straps are definitely too short. She is much happier in a Maclaren. I was thinking I'd use a sling plus the buggy and just use the Bee for the baby when I was without the toddler.

I would not have been comfortable pushing the volo with a baby in a sling as I did feel it was quite low and not that easy to push, and if you think your daughter is tall then I think the volo would have quite a short life, our daughter was too big for it before she was 2 and a half, we could still put her in but she wasn't very comfortable and it was not easy to move. But the sling and buggy option I agree is a good plan, she will be out of a buggy so soon that a double is a waste of money. Maybe spend the next 2 months getting her to practise on her scooter.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...