Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi folks,

I'm pregnant with number 2 and hoping to have my baby at Tommys. Last time I had to go into Waterloo for all my midwife appointments which was fine as I was working, but not so fine this time with a 2 year old in tow...so I've been looking at switching to forest hill group practice (my current surgery only has Lewisham midwives) to have my AN care more locally but just wondered if oakwood midwives will look after St Thomas ladies or if they are just attached to kings?

Thanks

My ONLY issue with kings is that I've heard horror stories about people having to share rooms whilst labouring / labouring in corridors etc....any they're not all urban myths, I have a friend who experienced some of that with all 3 children! I know it could happen at Tommys too but I had my first one there and it just seems familiar enough to want to do it again!

any hospital will have busy periods, which by there very nature are unpredictable.

No sharing rooms, busy corricdors at home. though? If you are classed as low risk then according to the place of birth study you are as safe if not safer staying at home. Second labours can be fast (no guarantees) and traffic to Tommys could lead to you delivering on the road! You need to decide what is right for you though and 9 months is a long time to plan the outcome at the beginning. Good luck whatever you decide

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Link to petition if anyone would like to object: Londis Off-License Petition https://chng.it/9X4DwTDRdW
    • He did mention it's share of freehold, I’d be very cautious with that. It can turn into a nightmare if relationships with neighbours break down. My brother had a share of freehold in a flat in West Hampstead, and when he needed to sell, the neighbour refused to sign the transfer of the freehold. What followed was over two years of legal battles, spiralling costs and constant stress. He lost several potential buyers, and the whole sale fell through just as he got a job offer in another city. It was a complete disaster. The neighbour was stubborn and uncooperative, doing everything they could to delay the process. It ended in legal deadlock, and there was very little anyone could do without their cooperation. At that point, the TA6 form becomes the least of your worries; it’s the TR1 form that matters. Without the other freeholder’s signature on that, you’re stuck. After seeing what my brother went through, I’d never touch a share of freehold again. When things go wrong, they can go really wrong. If you have a share of freehold, you need a respectful and reasonable relationship with the others involved; otherwise, it can be costly, stressful and exhausting. Sounds like these neighbours can’t be reasoned with. There’s really no coming back from something like this unless they genuinely apologise and replace the trees and plants they ruined. One small consolation is that people who behave like this are usually miserable behind closed doors. If they were truly happy, they’d just get on with their lives instead of trying to make other people’s lives difficult. And the irony is, they’re being incredibly short-sighted. This kind of behaviour almost always backfires.  
    • I had some time with him recently at the local neighbourhood forum and actually was pretty impressed by him, I think he's come a long way.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...