Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I know there are many subsidence threads on here, and I have consulted them. But here's the gen:


My next door neighbour has just been landed with an insurance renewal quote from her broker for ?1500. This is a jump of 500 quid from last year. I have rung a specialist broker who has basically told me that they cannot do a whole lot better than this figure. Last year she spotted a crack in her house which turned out to be purely cosmetic and thus she got no dosh for that, but it registers as a claim (the surveyor charged the insurer in excess of a grand for a visit which lasted about 15 minutes - on the plus side there was also a letter saying previous work has held well and NO SIGN OF ANY MOVEMENT). No one seems to be budging on this one. Current advice is either pay up 1500 quid, or re-insure excluding subsidence (probs cost of 700 quid), or try and haggle with extremely uninterested insurance company.


Would like to know if anyone has any constructive advice, as my little old lady neighbour was in tears over this, earlier today.

You need to contact a few specialist brokers to compare, you may or may not get a lower quote, but the cost should go down over a few years to something more manageable.


Adrian Flux / Ember JD are good, or search here http://www.biba.org.uk/CustomerHome.aspx picking contents and then subsidence..

I was locked in to a specialist insurer as a condition of original mortgage. I then commissioned a specialist structural engineer survey which demonstrated that subsidence was not a significant problem and that existing foundations and, some existing, underpinning were entirely satisfactory. T'is reduced my annual premium by > ?750 which, over the subsequent 3 years more than paid for the survey.


An option worth investigating.

Lowlander Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You need to contact a few specialist brokers to

> compare, you may or may not get a lower quote, but

> the cost should go down over a few years to

> something more manageable.

>

> Adrian Flux / Ember JD are good, or search here

> http://www.biba.org.uk/CustomerHome.aspx picking

> contents and then subsidence..


The options i outlined in my original quote are from a specialist broker

!:(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Aria came round and quickly found a simple solution to a leaking shower. No fuss and avoided complicated work. Excellent
    • Comparing to Week 11 last season, the table is a lot more compact, even the distance between top and bottom is half of what it was when RC was a runaway leader on 90+ points. Also worth remembering there are 25 or so game weeks left, so any points difference can slowly be eroded away. Week 11 points...   Week 11 table....      
    • Some people don’t like it, some people will love it.  It doesn’t bother me at all. In fact I quite like it. I do not like assumptions you make about ‘elderly people’. 
    • This concerns me as it essentially disregards the significant number of people who do experience a high level of disruption because of the event.  While it's great that you personally are not inconvenienced, this is absolutely not the case for a great many residents many of whom are elderly or who do not have private gardens and rely on the park.   Great that you have a PHD in ecology but might also be worth reading the report into the environmental impact of Gala which paints a rather different story to yours. This comes round every year with a request to extend. This seems to me to be a distraction to steer everyone away from the main event. However, Southwark Council and Councillor Catherine Rose in particular must bear responsibility for what is effectively privatisation of our community space.  I requested data on the results of the last consultations and had to use a subject access request to get it.  In 2024 the council received 111 responses of which 108 were negative. The event went ahead. Last year they received 136 of which 82 were negative and 34 said only with major changes (which did not happen).   The impact of the event on the community and the enviroment is well-documented.  The council has so far refused to supply data on the demographics of the attendees but it doesn't take much to work out that this is largely single under 30s from out of borough judging by the steady stream of people from the station.   Please do take time to protest and also to email Events as we try to hold the council accountable for their disregard of the public consultation results. Appendix 1.pdf 2025 consultation.pdf
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...