Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Yes, I can't argue with the new scheme only being for families where both parents work (or one if single parent), but I do find the perception that stay at home parenting is a massive luxury a bit less straightforward. Obviously that's the case for many people. But for many others, working just doesn't pay - that's the whole point of this new system being introduced - to try to make it easier for people to go back to work.* Particularly if you have more than one child, and so are paying double the childcare, you have to be on pretty high salary to be making any profit. Equally there are those, and I know several people in this situation, who have made huge sacrifices to stay at home, it's a decision they've made for their own reasons. So I don't think it's possible to generalise.


*whether the new scheme is any better or not, I still can't work out. It'll apply to more people but initially anyway not to over 5s, which means afterschool club/breakfast club costs won't be covered.

Could not agree with you more mrs tp. I was told by my employer "to not even ask for flexible working", which is illegal, I know. Clever flexible policies, such the ones gaby hinsliff describes in her book Half a Wife, would not be that onerous on companies.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Marveling at the chutzpah of Brexit supporters wanging on about a 4.99% increase in council tax which equates to circa £94/year for the average Band D, whereas it's conservatively estimated* that Brexit has cost each UK household circa £1k/year.  At least with council tax there are actual tangible benefits e.g. weekly waste clearance.  *Based on BoE report 2023...
    • so to summarise, "Party X is stating that Council Y is financially inefficient and saving can be realised or efficiencies made, but when the exercise has been completed, it was found that no savings were achievable". I don't know if you are trying to say that has happened or that if it does happen, that is what would happen.     
    • I would respectfully and strongly disagree.  they are targeting Southwark in exactly the same way they target other councils and will have exactly the same outcome  you would have to say why Southwark is the outlier here and not reform for it to be a meaningful differentiation 
    • Welcome to the year of the Fire Horse
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...