Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Deptford's rise: swish new riverside homes and a flagship Waitrose


Swish new riverside flats and a Waitrose are giving SE8 lifestyle appeal - but it is refusing to get 'too grand', says David Spittles

* A new village of 980 homes will be built by 2014 at Deptford Creek overlooking the Thames.


* A flagship Waitrose will be opening at New Capital Quay between Deptford and Greenwich.


* Deptford train station and its surroundings are benefiting from a ?42 million mixed-used development with 121 apartments and three town houses. Derelict arches are being transformed into workspaces and shops are being renovated.


* A riverside plaza, featuring an art gallery, museum, cr?che, design studios, bars and resturants, will be opening at New Capital Quay.



Depends Mickeymouse if you define an area by its postcode or not. Looks like Deptford to me.

No Mick Mac its definitely in Greenwich proper. Regardless of the postcode, per google maps the store will be less than a 5 minute walk from the Cutty Sark in central Greenwich, whereas it will be a 15 minute walk from Deptford station, in central Deptford. Geographically and postcode wise its 100% in Greenwich and the ES is basically lying for its advertisers. I am not sure what you are looking at?


The ES article is annoyingly mixing up the developments which are currently being built in Deptford and causing confusion.


The "new village of 980 homes" is a different development in Deptford. One which I imagine when being sold will be in the estate-agent made up place of "West Greenwich SE8", as developers increasingly try to erase what they see as grubby Deptford from marketing brochures, like this place: http://www.paynesandborthwick.com/. This website makes me laugh, the development must be 20 minutes from Greenwich station and less than ten from Deptford station yet they blurt on about the wonderful connections in "West Greenwich SE8". Such clap trap.


New Capital Quay cannot be "between Deptford and Greenwich", its either in Deptford or Greenwich, unless its being built on stilts above the Creek which it is not. That is just the Evening Standard trying to rationalise its incredibly incorrect article.


"a ?42 million mixed-used development with 121 apartments" - again this is a different development in Deptford.


Sorry for writing so much, just bugs me how bad that ES article was!

This is like Hoopers (R.I.P) claiming to be in Dulwich. Why do people do it, who gives a shit.


Anyway, glad to hear the station area is having a lot of investment, that part is pretty run down. I do like Deptford though, and had some great nights out around there back when I had a life.

Deptford has a fantastic array of interesting shops. Yes it is a bit front line but that adds to the attraction.


Why are you lot so shallow? I'm proud not to have a Waitrose or M&S and I can always sneak off to Beckenham in disguise for a crafty shop. Or Greenwich by the sounds of it (which in defence has always been posh).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I wonder whether his political epiphany and renaissance will stretch to him using his real name - James Ashworth-McLintock - rather than the more proletarian 'McAsh'. To my mind, the only people who should have self-bestowed mononyms are very talented Brazilian footballers - Pele, Kaka, Ronaldinho - very talented female pop icons - Madonna, Shakira, Sonia - or Russian revolutionaries - Lenin, Stalin, Trotsky. Sonia's greatest hits compilation, 'Greatest Hits', is out now on vinyl & CD through PWL Recordings.
    • Probably more helpful to ask simply whether McCash was affiliated with the Greens before becoming a Labour councillor. Trying to explain your thought process and unravel your fevered imagination (particularly when it comes to local politica) is the kind of thing that might require several years of psychoanalysis.
    • made the mistake of going to megans twice in DV.. would never make that mistake a 3rd time. Ditto I liked Romeo Jones a lot they did lovely soups and sandwiches and coffee too and such loveley staff.
    • Aren't most marxists radical by default...and he was a self proclaimed marxist on his twitter feed for years but deleted it as I suspect it did not sit well at Labour HQ. The big worry for Labour might be that he takes votes away from them (but not enough for him to win a seat) especially as there may be a significant protest vote against them at the national level as they are making such a pig's ear of things. I suspect though Labour are glad to see the back of him - to say he was a thorn in their side is an understatement and his loss of the leadership of the council was clearly part of the purge Labour has been embarking on to rid itself of some of the far-left lunatic fringe that have blighted them for so long. The Greens of course are willingly take any disaffected far-left Labour rejects in the same way Reform are hovvering up the lunatic elements of the Tories. The fact he went in with both barrels on Labour is hardly surprisingly but wonderfully hypocritical of someone who thought they were about to lead a Labour council. My how politicians flip-flop to suit their own personal agenda. How long before he falls out with the Greens...where to then? Why do I think he had an affiliation with the Greens before he became a Labour councillor? Or did I imagine that?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...