Jump to content

two free sociable cycle rides Sat April 13th and climate-safe streets ride April 23rd


Recommended Posts

First: reminder about this Saturday?s rides (16th). Magnificent Cemeteries and a Waterloo Church , still some places. Greenwich to Victoria Park Nearly full, but can try Wait List.



Climate Safe Streets Cycle Ride, April 23rd


Local boroughs decide the layout of almost all roads in London. Councillors talk the talk about active transport, but do they walk the walk (or cycle the cycle)?


Elections are a time to pressure our local politicians to TAKE ACTION. To improve cycling facilities MUCH MORE so that our roads are safer, our planet less polluted ? and we are all healthier.


The London Cycling Campaign are organising a programme of action for Climate Safe Streets (https://lcc.org.uk/campaigns/climate-safe-streets/). As part of this the local groups in Southwark, Lewisham and Greenwich are having a joint ride on Saturday 23rd April. Will be an easy route and marshals will control the busy bits so families can join in. You do not have to be a member of LCC. We want everyone to come along and demonstrate to councillors and candidates that more needs to be done to encourage cycling - to improve road safety and reduce pollution.


There are start/finish points in each borough.


Borough



Location of start point



Start time



End time


Greenwich



Cutty Sark Gardens





09:30am





12:30pm


Lewisham



Folkestone Gardens, Trundleys Rd SE8 5JE





10:00am





1:00pm


Southwark



Southwark Park Pavilion Cafe





10:30am





1.30pm




You do not have to do the whole route. Fine to join us for just a stretch. Or great if you can do the entire route back and forth through all 3 boroughs. Route map.


Decorate your bike. Make a placard and work out how to carry it on your bike. We want to attract attention!


Please register on Eventbrite if you can, it helps with the planning, Climate Safe Streets Ride - Greenwich, Lewisham & Southwark. However, not required ? it is OK to just turn up.

P.S Nice LCC video at

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello, I am looking for some lego minifigures for my son's birthday. If you are getting rid of any, please let me know. Thank you! Jo 07950 083 258
    • you're missing the point and come across as just being disagreeable.   I'm therefore just going to close this - as it;'s not a debate or an argument   DRIVERS  - please pay extra care as there are cyclists who are very low visibility and without lights or suitable clothing CYCLISTS - Put lights on your bike - front and back - and reflective strips at the very least. Consider other road users and pedestrians.  EVERYONE - Be safe    
    • There is no law about what people must wear when cycling. The highway code also suggests that pedestrians might want to wear bright clothes in order to make themselves more visible, but I don't think many people actually follow that advice. I think people should wear what ever they feel comfortable in. You shouldn't have to wear 'special clothes' in order to use a bicycle, or to take a walk. Seeing as you pose a far higher risk to others when you're travelling by car, there is arguably a far greater moral duty on you to consider how colourful your car is, than how brightly you dress as a pedestrian or cyclist. There are laws about lights. I agree that people should have lights on at night.  There are invisible cyclists? 🤣 You have no sympathy for someone travelling perfectly legally by bicycle, with good lights and reflectors, and who is hit by a driver paying insufficient attention, if they're not wearing bright clothing? And does the same view extend to pedestrians? From the highway code:
    • Cyclists who chose not to follow advice, guidance or rules specific to visability in poor light conditions choose the risks they run and I see no reason for sympathy when their luck runs out. However, I do feel sympathy both for pedestrians hit by invisible cyclists, and obviously those with visual or hearing impairment which adds to their risk on the pavements or road, and to drivers who may hit these invisible cyclists and suffer guilt or trauma having done so. And anyone who wishes to suggest that a cyclist so hit is not to blame because it's always the drivers fault can go hang.  Why do you think the rules and guidance exist in the first place? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...