Jump to content

Recommended Posts

If anyone wants to comment on on the new planning proposal for the Barry Parade Development you can via the link below. The ref is 22/AP/0539


It's marginally different to the proposal which is currently with the Secretary of State in appeal [Ref 18/AP/2238] after being rejected by the council, so if you commented on this previous version your comments won't be taken into account on the new one.


Comments need to be made by 21 April.


https://planning.southwark.gov.uk/online-applications/simpleSearchResults.do?action=firstPage

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/307129-barry-parade-development/
Share on other sites

Go onto the Southwark planning portal and search for Barry parade, it will be the first one to pop up


Interesting issue is that they are proposing a loading bay for two retail units along the parking bays where the bus stop is on Barry Road.


Quote

DELIVERY AND SERVICING

4.5.1 As part of the previous application (18-AP-2238), it was agreed with LBS to amend the kerbside arrangements on Barry Road, by converting the existing parking bay north of the bus border into a loading bay. The suggested restrictions for this loading bay were ?Loading Only 7am to 10am, Max Stay 40 minutes, no return within two hours?.


4.5.2 The amendments also required the existing double yellow lines ?no waiting at any time? restrictions at the southern kerb of the Barry Road / Peckham Rye to be extended 4.5m to the southwest to prevent multiple vehicles using the loading bay, which would subsequently improve access for buses trying to turn into Barry Road.


4.5.3 For completeness, a copy of the on-street arrangement previously agreed with LBS is provided at Appendix D.


4.5.4 It is proposed to retain the agreed servicing arrangement for the proposed development. The agreed servicing strategy involved the use of the amended loading bay on Barry Road, which is suitably located in order to minimise transfer distances to the entry points to the ground floor commercial units.


4.5.5 Where required within the commercial units, roll cages and trolleys will be stored internally, with goods being delivered directly to the appropriate units - an approach which was acknowledged as being acceptable within paragraph 48 of the LBS officer?s report in response to the previous application.


4.5.6 In order to deliver this proposal, the Applicant would help fund a proportionate contribution towards an amendment to the Traffic Management Order which is anticipated to be incorporated within the Section 106 agreement.


Unquote


Now I'm not an expert but a bus at the stop and a lorry parked up outside the parade will create a hazard for cyclists and cars trying to get passed.


Not a practical or safe solution in my mind

The last planning application was turned down partly because 19 people objected. Currently there's only three comments on the latest application, all objecting.


I think there's less comments because there was a letter at the beginning of March saying that the previous planning application was with the Secretary of State for appeal and any comments made on this version would be taken into consideration with the appeal. The developer then put in a separate new application and a letter was sent to local residents mid March stating there was a planning application for Barry Parade. It looked like it was the same as the early March letter, although it wasn't.


Any comments on the new planning application need to be made by Thu 21 April.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A Christmas Carol at the Old Vic and a visit to Dennis Severs house in Spitalfields
    • Maurice fixed a blocked pipe in our bathroom, was communicative and reliable during the enquiry process, personable and professional during the fix and reasonable in his pricing. Would recommend.
    • Dishing the dirt is generally fine when it comes to politicians and in Farage's case he often deserves it but  nothing illegal  has been done. It is not illegal for him to give his partner a sizeable amount of money with which to buy a house and have it registered in her name. He is 64 years old and his partner is 16 years younger and so he most likely is making plans to minimise IHT. There is a sliding scale for IHT but basically a gift is free of IHT if the gift is made 7 years before the donor dies. Farage is 64 years old and his partner is 16 years younger. In 7 years time, if he lives that long, he will be 71 years old. Given that he smokes like a chimney and drinks like a fish, his odds on getting beyond 71  years may be pretty slim.  A similar  process is followed by the "bank of mum and dad"  where parents  give money to their kids to fund purchase of a property. Many who are not cash rich will mortgage their home and so release equity to fund their kids property. We did it as have many of our friends.  
    • Week 4 fixtures...   Saturday 13th September Arsenal v Nottingham Forest AFC Bournemouth v Brighton & Hove Albion Crystal Palace v Sunderland Everton v Aston Villa Fulham v Leeds United Newcastle United v Wolverhampton Wanderers West Ham United v Tottenham Hotspur Brentford v Chelsea   Sunday 14th September Burnley v Liverpool Manchester City v Manchester United
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...