Jump to content

Recommended Posts

You're missing his/my points here, Huguenot/ El Pibe

Loz is veering towards stuff discussed on previous threads. I took issue with his callous comments and have asked him to continue the Deanne privately to save the likes of yourself having to suffer it once again.


Originally, I pointed out a doc that might might have been of interest to a few on here, those who have discussed Hillsborough on threads before, hence choosing a new title/ thread so as not to regurgitate old discussions.

For your info, I'm not aware of all the umbrella threads on here, as I reckon aren't many other posters.

Santerme Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Parkdrive Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Why should should there be a minutes silence

> for

> > her. She did f**k all for football and thought

> all

> > fans were thugs and hooligans.

>

> She wasn't far wrong.



She was out of touch with the vast majority of decent football fans, and by the sound of it so are you.

Atticus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Loz is veering towards stuff discussed on previous threads. I took issue with his callous comments

> and have asked him to continue the Deanne privately to save the likes of yourself having to

> suffer it once again.


I really have no idea what this means. What are you on about, Atticus?

Loz, pls excuse my poor spelling and grammar, all written in haste. Deanne was a spellcheck replacement for a word I reckon was meant to be something like 'matter'.


I invited you to PM me if you wanted to discuss the issue further, not the other way round, the offer still stands.

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The exam question is what on earth is this thread

> about. Can someone summarise it in the way the Sun

> would (Sun journos are very good at geting their

> message across clearly).

>

> Agree wholeheartedly with coments on Mrs T and

> footy though.


Are you taking the piss?

  • 3 years later...

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Atticus Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Perhaps you should have watched it instead of

> making smart arsed comments.

>

> What... too soon?



Loz, hope you and your likes now have a little more understanding as to what happened on the day,

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • To be fair to Sue, she doesn't have to explain or justify why she supports or wants to vote for any party. That is the same for everyone. We are free to decide which party best reflects what we think is important to us. Discussing the stances/ policies of parties, in a general discussion, can be done without targetting anyone commenting here. Politics is just a point of view at the end of the day.  Different things are important to different people, often for very valid reasons. Let's be respectful of that.  My opinion is that if say the Labour Party wants to understand why it is losing supporters to the Greens, it needs to listen to and understand the reasons why. That theme has been explored in this thread a little through the discussion around councillor McAsh. The same is true of the Tories losing support to Reform and the Libdems. Let's not also assume that every member of every party is completely on board with every policy of the leadership of that party either. You only have to look at how backbenchers have forced u-turns from Starmer's cabinet on things like Welfare Reform and WFA to see that. 
    • As a compromise I'd be prepared to trial the reintroduction of dog licensing. The annual licence fee would be the same as road tax for Range Rover (same carbon emissions as a dog) and would require owners to pass a responsible dog ownership exam, the dogs would need to pass training and a behaviour exam and their DNA would need to be kept on record to identify the owners who leave dog shit all over the pavements, so that they can be jailed.  
    • Yeah  Ban people, that will solve all the planets environmental issues over night  Leave the dogs as they aren't the problem, its normally bad ownership and management that leads to badly behaved dogs. Spartacus  Ps Cat Rule 
    • Some people are all of the above. Would happily ban them, or send them to training school
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...