Jump to content

Recommended Posts

You're missing his/my points here, Huguenot/ El Pibe

Loz is veering towards stuff discussed on previous threads. I took issue with his callous comments and have asked him to continue the Deanne privately to save the likes of yourself having to suffer it once again.


Originally, I pointed out a doc that might might have been of interest to a few on here, those who have discussed Hillsborough on threads before, hence choosing a new title/ thread so as not to regurgitate old discussions.

For your info, I'm not aware of all the umbrella threads on here, as I reckon aren't many other posters.

Santerme Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Parkdrive Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Why should should there be a minutes silence

> for

> > her. She did f**k all for football and thought

> all

> > fans were thugs and hooligans.

>

> She wasn't far wrong.



She was out of touch with the vast majority of decent football fans, and by the sound of it so are you.

Atticus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Loz is veering towards stuff discussed on previous threads. I took issue with his callous comments

> and have asked him to continue the Deanne privately to save the likes of yourself having to

> suffer it once again.


I really have no idea what this means. What are you on about, Atticus?

Loz, pls excuse my poor spelling and grammar, all written in haste. Deanne was a spellcheck replacement for a word I reckon was meant to be something like 'matter'.


I invited you to PM me if you wanted to discuss the issue further, not the other way round, the offer still stands.

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The exam question is what on earth is this thread

> about. Can someone summarise it in the way the Sun

> would (Sun journos are very good at geting their

> message across clearly).

>

> Agree wholeheartedly with coments on Mrs T and

> footy though.


Are you taking the piss?

  • 3 years later...

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Atticus Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Perhaps you should have watched it instead of

> making smart arsed comments.

>

> What... too soon?



Loz, hope you and your likes now have a little more understanding as to what happened on the day,

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...