Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello All,


Although I am just up the road in SE5 this problem - basically too many users on VM's infrastructure - apparently affects large parts of SE London and originates with some VM infrastructure at Lewisham. The result is severely decreased broadband speeds at peak times. In my case the first sign was iPlayer constantly buffering in the evening, and I have seen as low as 0.8Mbps on a 60Mbps service.


The good news is that anyone affected can request a refund from Virgin.


A couple of examples from VM's forums:


http://community.virginmedia.com/t5/Up-to-60Mb-Speed/Unusable-broadband-in-South-East-London-VM-acknowledges-too-many/m-p/1528162/highlight/true#M5255

http://community.virginmedia.com/t5/Up-to-60Mb-Speed/F002125723-Speed-Issue-relating-to-network-congestion-contention/m-p/1753032/highlight/true#M17855

This sounds absolutely right. The majority of broadband third party resellers are effectively sub contracting share of BT fixed bandwidth.


New suppliers tend to 'loss lead' by buying more bandwidth than they have sold, giving major speed advantages to early buyers.


As later buyers come in, the sub contractor doesn't buy any more bandwidth - to recover the loss lead - and all subscribers suffer.


You SHOULD complain. This is subject to regulator oversight and the complaints are valid.

> The majority of broadband third party resellers are effectively sub contracting share of BT fixed bandwidth.


But I assume the complaints this time are about Virgin's dedicated high bandwidth Cable service -- it's that section of the forum - rather than the BT POTS one that VM call National.


I wouldn't be at all surprised about their being overcommitted. I'm on their National service, and experienced over a year of seeing my downloads instantly capped to 2 Mb/s, long after my service had been upgraded so that at startup each day it routinely synched at 8 Mb/s.

H, the quoted 60mb is on dedicated cable, it's unsurprisingly not available on ADSL via BT infrastructure.


Peak times you would expect a detox anyway, that's why they're peak, though I've done some spot testing over the weeks and get about 3-6 mbit at peak times, but they don't last long. I was stuck on 0.8 for years due to poor infrastructure on the Brixton exchange ADSL so I can live with that.

  • 3 weeks later...

KestonKid Wrote:


I have been experiencing unusably slow broadband from Virgin media for about 6 weeks now. It may be a different set of issues from those others have described here. Previously I have found the service fairly stable and reliably usable.


I am on the L package. I have a technician coming tomorrow as I've been told by technical services that there is a problem of some kind.


I'll update after their visit if it's of use to other Virgin media customers

The virgin media fibre service seems to have improved considerably over the last 7 days (Se15 4le) - have been able to watch full movies on lovefilm.com, which was not possible before. We did have it confirmed that as there was an ongoing problem, we would be given a full refund (not much use as brandnew subscription and first 6month are free) plus we would not be held to contract. Haven't moved (yet?) as we cannot decide if other providers are any better....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Eh? That wasn't "my quote"! If you look at your post above,it is clearly a quote by Rockets! None of us have any  idea what a Corbyn led government during Covid would have been like. But do you seriously think it would have been worse than Johnson's self-serving performance? What you say about the swing of seats away from Labour in 2019 is true. But you have missed my point completely. The fact that Labour under Corbyn got more than ten million votes does not mean that Corbyn was "unelectable", does it? The present electoral system is bonkers, which is why a change is apparently on the cards. Anyway, it is pointless discussing this, because we are going round in circles. As for McCluskey, whatever the truth of that report, I can't see what it has to do with Corbyn?
    • Exactly what I said, that Corbyn's group of univeristy politics far-left back benchers would have been a disaster during Covid if they had won the election. Here you go:  BBC News - Ex-union boss McCluskey took private jet flights arranged by building firm, report finds https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3kgg55410o The 2019 result was considered one of the worst in living memory for Labour, not only for big swing of seats away from them but because they lost a large number of the Red-wall seats- generational Labour seats. Why? Because as Alan Johnson put it so succinctly: "Corbyn couldn't lead the working class out of a paper bag"! https://youtu.be/JikhuJjM1VM?si=oHhP6rTq4hqvYyBC
    • Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...