Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello All,


Although I am just up the road in SE5 this problem - basically too many users on VM's infrastructure - apparently affects large parts of SE London and originates with some VM infrastructure at Lewisham. The result is severely decreased broadband speeds at peak times. In my case the first sign was iPlayer constantly buffering in the evening, and I have seen as low as 0.8Mbps on a 60Mbps service.


The good news is that anyone affected can request a refund from Virgin.


A couple of examples from VM's forums:


http://community.virginmedia.com/t5/Up-to-60Mb-Speed/Unusable-broadband-in-South-East-London-VM-acknowledges-too-many/m-p/1528162/highlight/true#M5255

http://community.virginmedia.com/t5/Up-to-60Mb-Speed/F002125723-Speed-Issue-relating-to-network-congestion-contention/m-p/1753032/highlight/true#M17855

This sounds absolutely right. The majority of broadband third party resellers are effectively sub contracting share of BT fixed bandwidth.


New suppliers tend to 'loss lead' by buying more bandwidth than they have sold, giving major speed advantages to early buyers.


As later buyers come in, the sub contractor doesn't buy any more bandwidth - to recover the loss lead - and all subscribers suffer.


You SHOULD complain. This is subject to regulator oversight and the complaints are valid.

> The majority of broadband third party resellers are effectively sub contracting share of BT fixed bandwidth.


But I assume the complaints this time are about Virgin's dedicated high bandwidth Cable service -- it's that section of the forum - rather than the BT POTS one that VM call National.


I wouldn't be at all surprised about their being overcommitted. I'm on their National service, and experienced over a year of seeing my downloads instantly capped to 2 Mb/s, long after my service had been upgraded so that at startup each day it routinely synched at 8 Mb/s.

H, the quoted 60mb is on dedicated cable, it's unsurprisingly not available on ADSL via BT infrastructure.


Peak times you would expect a detox anyway, that's why they're peak, though I've done some spot testing over the weeks and get about 3-6 mbit at peak times, but they don't last long. I was stuck on 0.8 for years due to poor infrastructure on the Brixton exchange ADSL so I can live with that.

  • 3 weeks later...

KestonKid Wrote:


I have been experiencing unusably slow broadband from Virgin media for about 6 weeks now. It may be a different set of issues from those others have described here. Previously I have found the service fairly stable and reliably usable.


I am on the L package. I have a technician coming tomorrow as I've been told by technical services that there is a problem of some kind.


I'll update after their visit if it's of use to other Virgin media customers

The virgin media fibre service seems to have improved considerably over the last 7 days (Se15 4le) - have been able to watch full movies on lovefilm.com, which was not possible before. We did have it confirmed that as there was an ongoing problem, we would be given a full refund (not much use as brandnew subscription and first 6month are free) plus we would not be held to contract. Haven't moved (yet?) as we cannot decide if other providers are any better....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But all those examples sell a wide variety of things,  and mostly they are well spread out along Lordship Lane. These two shops both sell one very specific thing, albeit in different flavours, and are just across the road from each other. I don't think you can compare the distribution of shops in Roman times to the distribution of shops in Lordship Lane in the twenty first century. Well, you can, but it doesn't feel very appropriate. Haa anybody asked the first shop how they feel? Are they happy about the "healthy competition" ?
    • ED is included in the 17 August closure set (or just possibly 15 August, depending on which part of the page you trust more) listed at https://metro.co.uk/2025/07/25/full-list-25-poundland-stores-confirmed-close-august-23753048/. Here incidentally are some snippets from their annual reports, at https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/02495645/filing-history. 2022: " during the period we opened 41 stores and closed 43 loss-making/under-performing stores.  At the period-end we were trading from 821 stores in the UK, IoM and ROI. ... "We renogotiated 82 leases in the year, saving on average 45% versus the prior lease agreement..." 2023: "We also continued to improve our market footprint through sourcing better store locations, opening 53 and closing 51 stores during the year." 2024:  "The ex-Wilco stores acquired in the prior year have formed a core part of this strategy to expand our store network.  We favour quality over quantity and during the period we opened 84 stores and closed 71 loss-making/under-performing ones."
    • Ha! After I posted this, I thought of lots more examples. Screwfix and the hardware store? Mrs Robinson and Jumping Bean? Chemists, plant shops, hairdressers...  the list goes on... it's good to have healthy competition  Ooooh! Two cheese shops
    • You've got a point.  Thinking Leyland and Screwfix too but this felt different.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...