Jump to content

free sociable cycle ride Sat May 28th extra places added


Recommended Posts

you must book ahead on eventbrite


Greenwich to Royal Docks.


Flat 3 hour, 13 mile ride so pretty easy-paced. Lots of Thameside and dock-side path or quiet streets. Start 10am, aim to finish 1pm at Cutty Sark. Start location: Greenwich Station. Meet at main entrance on Greenwich High Road, near the Novotel (not DLR station entrance or on platform). OR meet at tunnel exit at Island Gardens at 10.15 (for people happy to carry bikes down/up steps at Greenwich Foot Tunnel, or who can ride directly to Island Gardens). Please indicate on the registration form if you plan to join at Island Gardens. Leader Jamie.


Route. To begin we will take the DLR to Mudchute (bring face mask and travel pass or equivalent). Then east side of Isle of Dogs to Blackwall, East India Dock Basin, Lee flyover cycle path, Royal Victoria Dock, Excel Centre, Royal Albert Dock, London City Airport. Start return over Sir Steve Redgrave Bridge, then across Woolwich Ferry (or if just miss one via Foot Tunnel). Back via Thames Path (NCN 4) past Flood Barrier and O2. Most of route will be same as on previous Thames Lovers ride, map at

As Jamie said in his report from that ride, ?There cannot be many healthy activities more enjoyable than a cycle along a warm and sunny London river path with good company.? Fingers crossed we get the warm and sunny again!


These rides are part of the Southwark Cyclists' Healthy Rides programme, [southwarkcyclists.org.uk]. These rides are organised by Southwark Cyclists and are part of a regular programme of Saturday rides, more information at [southwarkcyclists.org.uk]. Southwark Cyclists are part of the London Cycling Campaign. This ride is organised by volunteers. If you have any feedback, good or bad, please get in touch with [email protected]. For details of LCC?s Safeguarding and other policies please see lcc.org.uk

Royal Docks Ride, Saturday 28th. Extra places have been created for this ride. If you found all places booked earlier in the week and would still like to join the ride, then check again. Same link: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/greenwich-to-royal-docks-cycle-ride-tickets-346798863737.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello, I am looking for some lego minifigures for my son's birthday. If you are getting rid of any, please let me know. Thank you! Jo 07950 083 258
    • you're missing the point and come across as just being disagreeable.   I'm therefore just going to close this - as it;'s not a debate or an argument   DRIVERS  - please pay extra care as there are cyclists who are very low visibility and without lights or suitable clothing CYCLISTS - Put lights on your bike - front and back - and reflective strips at the very least. Consider other road users and pedestrians.  EVERYONE - Be safe    
    • There is no law about what people must wear when cycling. The highway code also suggests that pedestrians might want to wear bright clothes in order to make themselves more visible, but I don't think many people actually follow that advice. I think people should wear what ever they feel comfortable in. You shouldn't have to wear 'special clothes' in order to use a bicycle, or to take a walk. Seeing as you pose a far higher risk to others when you're travelling by car, there is arguably a far greater moral duty on you to consider how colourful your car is, than how brightly you dress as a pedestrian or cyclist. There are laws about lights. I agree that people should have lights on at night.  There are invisible cyclists? 🤣 You have no sympathy for someone travelling perfectly legally by bicycle, with good lights and reflectors, and who is hit by a driver paying insufficient attention, if they're not wearing bright clothing? And does the same view extend to pedestrians? From the highway code:
    • Cyclists who chose not to follow advice, guidance or rules specific to visability in poor light conditions choose the risks they run and I see no reason for sympathy when their luck runs out. However, I do feel sympathy both for pedestrians hit by invisible cyclists, and obviously those with visual or hearing impairment which adds to their risk on the pavements or road, and to drivers who may hit these invisible cyclists and suffer guilt or trauma having done so. And anyone who wishes to suggest that a cyclist so hit is not to blame because it's always the drivers fault can go hang.  Why do you think the rules and guidance exist in the first place? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...