Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi I have family coming up from Sussex , they need to pay ulez . My question is the £12.50 they pay is it one off payment? If they stay for 2 nights then travel back . Do they pay another 12.50 leaving east Dulwich?. They want to avoid paying the £10 auto admin fee.

Cheers

It's a charge for entering London with an older polluting car. The concept was brought in by a Tory mayor. I expect most of us either agree with it or have got used to it. 10000s die each year from pollution derived from road traffic. By all means ask questions but don't see why you need to give such views. Piston heads is a better place.


Some free advice, don't register but just simply pay and save your friends a tenner

Check with them if they have a 'polluting car' as if they do not they will not have to pay. My daughter comes up from Sussex for a couple of days and does not have to pay the charge. You can check on the website whether your car will be charged - all you need to do is put in registration number. My car is 16 years old and I do not have to pay the charge.
My car is 16 years old and I do not have to pay the charge.


The chances are that if you have a diesel car of that age you will have to pay, however. Petrol cars which are quite elderly were designed to emission standards which are acceptable, but this not true of diesel cars. My car (petrol) is 18 years old and exempt.


The original emission standards were set for vehicles travelling into the central (congestion charge) zone, where the impact of polluting vehicles, and particularly HGVs is most noted (because of traffic congestion and the impact of high rise infrastructure in retaining pollutants in the atmosphere). The extension out to the north and South Circulars (and possibly to the M25) is about revenue raising far more than air quality/ air pollution.

So those between the North and South Circs and the M25 don't desere cleaner air?? Whilst some of the most polluted roads are in central London such as Marylebone/Euston Road, and slightly further out Brixton Road, pollution doesn't magically stop as soon as you hit Streatham. We've had a low emission zone for trucks and buses for many years now and that covers the whole of London within the M25.


Older, more polluting petrol cars are allowed in the ULEZ as a compromise - you can't drive your 8 year old diesel but a 20 year old petrol that has gone twice round the clock is fine irrespective of the knackered engine. This was TfLs answer to complaints that those less well off would not be able to drive without a charge. The "money making scam" those of you in the tax payers alliance keep going on about will of course reduce as the car fleet turns over. For some it makes less and less sense to own a car and they will switch to public transport, activce travel or car clubs. Some may even decide to share journeys, this should be a public duty!


Happy to answer further questions on pollution, ULEZ, car technology.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
    • Very sorry to hear this, but surely the landlord is responsible for fixing the electrics?  Surely they must be insured for things like this? I hope you get it all sorted out quickly.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...