Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It's not just a question of the trees themselves. Pollarding outside late winter/early spring has knock-on effects on the birds and insects that make new spring growth their homes. While the trees do need to be pruned for many valid reasons, pollarding out of season is a sad practice. Councils pollard to avoid insurance claims or the percieved threat of claims, and may pollard out of season because they cannot afford to employ enough contractors to prune in the correct season. Also, I've recently read that severe pollarding may cause dead heartwood. Pollarding decreases root growth because it decreases vitality.


Councils may be basing their decisions on the experience of arborists who think their decisions are the only right ones because they've been in the business man-and-boy 40 years, blah, blah blah. But when they're basing their decisions on out-dated, incomplete, non-emperical evidence, how can these choices be accurately evaluated? I was recently enquiring about sources of data on the outcomes of pruning and root growth, and the best the arborist thought to offer was an outdated book on subsidence. Honestly, I'd expect better referencing from a first year uni student.


A large tree growing near a property is not necessarily going to cause problems, but I have the feeling that councils are scared sh1tless of insurance agents. Pathetic. I'd rather just be told outright that councils can't afford to do a correct job, than to have them try to fob me off with a bunch of bollocks.

Lewisham has very little information about their own tree pruning policies online; however, I have spoken with Lewisham council this spring. If you're in Lewisham, contact their planning dept. You're more likely to get a response from them than from any of the councillors IMHE. Southwark is slightly better in that is has some documents online about it tree policies. But you don't have to take my word for it. If you'd like more information, I urge you to contact your local council personally.
  • 2 months later...
In the height of summer now. How do those concerned parties feel about the response to concerns earlier in the year that were raise through local councillors and the contractor,Gristwood & Toms, who undertook the work. Was there ever a reply from the Arboricultural Association by the person who said they would write to them?

I am the OP. I don't think we ever heard from any professionals or decision-makers about the rationale for the pollarding. The trees are in leaf now, but the leaves are growing all the way down the trunks and have required additional pruning in order to keep the pavements clear. They certainly don't look how they have looked in the past, but I have no idea whether they will look better next year, or whether objective success criteria for the pollarding have been reached, and indeed what those criteria might be.


It just feels so frustrating to have so little information and therefore knowledge as to whether this whole exercise has been a good thing for the health and longevity of the trees (in which case I would be very happy), or whether they have now been damaged (in which case I would be very angry).

kiera Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Southwark's tree manager is giving a talk to the

> Peckham

> Society at the Goose Green Centre on 20th October

> at 3pm.

> The talk is entitled."The trees of Southwark" and

> you do not have to be a member of the Peckham

> Society to attend.


Date noted. Thank you for that Kiera.

intexasatthe moment Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> treehugger I doubt the trees have been damaged but

> the question I want answered is why were they

> pollarded in the summer when they were in full

> leaf ?


Tree huggers, the trees will be ok.


This was the purpose behind my and a number of other posters questions on this thread, which just haven't been answered. Ask any of the tree surgeons working on the trees, and I have, and they all say this is bad practice, arboriculturally.

  • 2 weeks later...

While we're on the topic here's the latest from George Monbiot, encouraging us all to remind Councils to choose what they plant from a list of native species, which are much more wildlife-friendly.


http://www.theguardian.com/environment/georgemonbiot/2013/aug/15/trees-native-exotic-wildlife-councils-insects


Do keep lobbying the councillors for your wards, folks, this is an issue that affects city dwellers everywhere, and particularly influences the beauty of this neighbourhood, set out with its tree-lined avenues and generous parks.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Just a review for Andy. I have now used him for various jobs for 5 years or so. An absolute and complete star. Always goes above and beyond, never cuts a corner, and always prices incredibly fairly. If you need a handyman...he is your man. Could not recommend more highly.
    • Don’t know about cafes but the Victoria and Montpelier pubs always have always encouraged people working during the day.
    • Thank you Saied for the amazing work! I will see you in a few months.
    • If you care about the decline in the swift population please support the lovely Hannah Bourne-Taylor in her campaign to mandate 'swift bricks' in all new properties   From her website: What are swift bricks? Zero maintenance and sustainable, swift bricks are bricks that sit flush to the wall that provide a cavity nesting habitat for swifts and other cavity nesting birds. Surveys show species include House martins, starlings, House sparrows, nuthatch, blue tit, coal tit and wren. Why swift bricks are urgently and uniquely essential Without swift bricks there is no guaranteed nesting habitat for birds reliant on building cavities anywhere in the UK – and there never will be. We are inadvertently destroying their oldcavity nesting sites through renovation, demolition and insulation, while climate mitigation measures mean modern buildings will never provide natural homes for birds. https://hannahbournetaylor.com/ Don't be such a pompous bore. She is doing something to improve the world around us, what does it matter what social class she is from? The despicable Michael Gove offered support then did nothing. The current government, despite supposed concern for the environment, also failed to support the campaign. She took the trouble to write back to me when I asked a question. But carry on poking fun at honourable people while our surroundings decay.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...