Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It's not just a question of the trees themselves. Pollarding outside late winter/early spring has knock-on effects on the birds and insects that make new spring growth their homes. While the trees do need to be pruned for many valid reasons, pollarding out of season is a sad practice. Councils pollard to avoid insurance claims or the percieved threat of claims, and may pollard out of season because they cannot afford to employ enough contractors to prune in the correct season. Also, I've recently read that severe pollarding may cause dead heartwood. Pollarding decreases root growth because it decreases vitality.


Councils may be basing their decisions on the experience of arborists who think their decisions are the only right ones because they've been in the business man-and-boy 40 years, blah, blah blah. But when they're basing their decisions on out-dated, incomplete, non-emperical evidence, how can these choices be accurately evaluated? I was recently enquiring about sources of data on the outcomes of pruning and root growth, and the best the arborist thought to offer was an outdated book on subsidence. Honestly, I'd expect better referencing from a first year uni student.


A large tree growing near a property is not necessarily going to cause problems, but I have the feeling that councils are scared sh1tless of insurance agents. Pathetic. I'd rather just be told outright that councils can't afford to do a correct job, than to have them try to fob me off with a bunch of bollocks.

Lewisham has very little information about their own tree pruning policies online; however, I have spoken with Lewisham council this spring. If you're in Lewisham, contact their planning dept. You're more likely to get a response from them than from any of the councillors IMHE. Southwark is slightly better in that is has some documents online about it tree policies. But you don't have to take my word for it. If you'd like more information, I urge you to contact your local council personally.
  • 2 months later...
In the height of summer now. How do those concerned parties feel about the response to concerns earlier in the year that were raise through local councillors and the contractor,Gristwood & Toms, who undertook the work. Was there ever a reply from the Arboricultural Association by the person who said they would write to them?

I am the OP. I don't think we ever heard from any professionals or decision-makers about the rationale for the pollarding. The trees are in leaf now, but the leaves are growing all the way down the trunks and have required additional pruning in order to keep the pavements clear. They certainly don't look how they have looked in the past, but I have no idea whether they will look better next year, or whether objective success criteria for the pollarding have been reached, and indeed what those criteria might be.


It just feels so frustrating to have so little information and therefore knowledge as to whether this whole exercise has been a good thing for the health and longevity of the trees (in which case I would be very happy), or whether they have now been damaged (in which case I would be very angry).

kiera Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Southwark's tree manager is giving a talk to the

> Peckham

> Society at the Goose Green Centre on 20th October

> at 3pm.

> The talk is entitled."The trees of Southwark" and

> you do not have to be a member of the Peckham

> Society to attend.


Date noted. Thank you for that Kiera.

intexasatthe moment Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> treehugger I doubt the trees have been damaged but

> the question I want answered is why were they

> pollarded in the summer when they were in full

> leaf ?


Tree huggers, the trees will be ok.


This was the purpose behind my and a number of other posters questions on this thread, which just haven't been answered. Ask any of the tree surgeons working on the trees, and I have, and they all say this is bad practice, arboriculturally.

  • 2 weeks later...

While we're on the topic here's the latest from George Monbiot, encouraging us all to remind Councils to choose what they plant from a list of native species, which are much more wildlife-friendly.


http://www.theguardian.com/environment/georgemonbiot/2013/aug/15/trees-native-exotic-wildlife-councils-insects


Do keep lobbying the councillors for your wards, folks, this is an issue that affects city dwellers everywhere, and particularly influences the beauty of this neighbourhood, set out with its tree-lined avenues and generous parks.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • was the price not displayed on the menu?
    • It has come to this author’s attention that the world of 4+ admissions — that most enigmatic of educational rites — continues to bewilder even the most composed of parents. Fear not. For in a former life, I was not merely a humble observer, but a seasoned educator of over twenty years, and Head of Pre-Prep for a distinguished dozen. Now, with quill exchanged for touchscreen, I have taken to that most modern of salons — Instagram — to dispense guidance, answer frequently whispered questions, and illuminate the shadowy corners of school selection with clarity and calm. Each post bears my signature twist: a blend of insight, levity, and the occasional raised eyebrow. Should you find yourself adrift in the sea of admissions, I suggest you peruse my latest dispatch. It may well be the lifeline you seek. The Delicate Dilemma of the Summer-born 4+ Scholars Yours in solidarity and scholastic savvy, Lord Pencilton  🎩✏️
    • Perhaps Gooseygreeny was not familiar with the wildlife before Gala was imposed on the park, since when its value to wildlife has deteriorated. The Park had never been disturbed before, as the council had respected it as a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation, so only the Common was licensed by them as a site for events. The first time Gala held their event, there was a tree with woodpeckers nesting in it right in the middle of the main field they used and thrushes, blackbirds and great tits nesting within the shrubs and trees immediately surrounding the field. The woodpeckers were thriving on ants from the anthills in the grass. To those of us who used to enjoy watching the wildlife, it was very obviously a Site of Importance for a variety of birds. Despite being accessed by the public and their dogs, it had been relatively undisturbed,  which was one of the main reasons why it was so special and why I have been opposed to the Gala festival being held during the bird nesting season.
    • So dangerous!    Can you be more specific about the road this was in and when you report it?  Maybe there’s some CCTV footage available
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...