Jump to content

Recommended Posts

freedom of speech, looks like dulwich forum has now stopped this so be careful what you say as the administrator will not let you say anything they don't like, i have been a member since 23 May 2009 now i don't think it's a good forum . i have pm a administrator about this and never got a reply what a way to run a forum.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/318155-freedom-of-speech/
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

Someone was selling a professional knife sharpener in the For Sale board and you were trying to jeopardise their sale by posting that it wasn't needed / too expensive / etc. Hence these being removed.


Not the first time you've tried to do this either.


The for sale board isn't a place to have a chat and criticise people's items for sale. That's incredibly poor etiquette.

Actually, a properly moderated forum does not offer unlimited freedom of speech - there are certain things said which, whilst not illegal, are nevertheless unhelpful, untrue or unnecessarily rude - and of course there are some things said which are, or may be, a breach of the law. The fact that Admin has put forward his reasoning in this case is helpful, as it helps clarify the moderating policy in this instance. In those parts of the forum where 'discussion' is expected a wide range of different views are allowed. But even these must and should be moderated. On occasion it is annoying where a legitimate view is 'lost' because it has formed part of a wider debate which is off topic or may even be verging (e.g. issues sub judice) on a breach of the law, where the view, expressed solus, would make no sense. But that's what good moderators sometimes need to do.

The general rules are caveat emptor, that is, that it is the buyer or potential buyer that needs to do due diligence. That may include more general research, but it is not up to others to editorialize a small ads page!


Other, perhaps, to indicate where you know from personal experience that a seller is not to be trusted, through e.g. non delivery or false description. Which doesn't include selling something that you wouldn't buy.


Had a poster, I suppose, asked whether something was good value or worth buying you could, reasonably, comment. But not as a gratuitous insertion. And it's not a question most would pose on a small ads site itself.

  • Administrator

For full disclosure, this was the topic where ken78's comments were deleted: https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/viewtopic.php?t=2288796


The seller is trying to sell a professional knife sharpening machine. The seller even posted links to other places where the same device sells for full retail price. Its a totally legitimate listing.


ken78's deleted posts were along the lines of 'this tool isn't needed / too expensive'. There is absolutely no need to make comments like this. The seller has every right to sell items like this on the forum without someone else completely uninvolved in the sale making negative comments about it. If someone is selling an item in bad faith, then you are welcome to report the post, but in this case there is absolutely nothing wrong with the listing.


There is no specific forum rule saying 'you can't discuss or post negative comments about other people's listings when you have no involvement with it', but it common courtesy that you shouldn't do this. The rule list would be far too long if we had to clarify every single scenario of what is respectful and what isn't.

the seller said it had only be used a few times, then it worked out it was used in his business by an apprentice so it was well used and as i have used one of these in my trade as a butcher i know the stones DO WEAR OUT but the sell never said this so as i said the seller was misleading buyers on this forum and i was in the wrong ? i put up the links of this as well

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Link to petition if anyone would like to object: Londis Off-License Petition https://chng.it/9X4DwTDRdW
    • The lady is called Janet 
    • He did mention it's share of freehold, I’d be very cautious with that. It can turn into a nightmare if relationships with neighbours break down. My brother had a share of freehold in a flat in West Hampstead, and when he needed to sell, the neighbour refused to sign the transfer of the freehold. What followed was over two years of legal battles, spiralling costs and constant stress. He lost several potential buyers, and the whole sale fell through just as he got a job offer in another city. It was a complete disaster. The neighbour was stubborn and uncooperative, doing everything they could to delay the process. It ended in legal deadlock, and there was very little anyone could do without their cooperation. At that point, the TA6 form becomes the least of your worries; it’s the TR1 form that matters. Without the other freeholder’s signature on that, you’re stuck. After seeing what my brother went through, I’d never touch a share of freehold again. When things go wrong, they can go really wrong. If you have a share of freehold, you need a respectful and reasonable relationship with the others involved; otherwise, it can be costly, stressful and exhausting. Sounds like these neighbours can’t be reasoned with. There’s really no coming back from something like this unless they genuinely apologise and replace the trees and plants they ruined. One small consolation is that people who behave like this are usually miserable behind closed doors. If they were truly happy, they’d just get on with their lives instead of trying to make other people’s lives difficult. And the irony is, they’re being incredibly short-sighted. This kind of behaviour almost always backfires.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...