Jump to content

Recommended Posts

freedom of speech, looks like dulwich forum has now stopped this so be careful what you say as the administrator will not let you say anything they don't like, i have been a member since 23 May 2009 now i don't think it's a good forum . i have pm a administrator about this and never got a reply what a way to run a forum.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/318155-freedom-of-speech/
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

Someone was selling a professional knife sharpener in the For Sale board and you were trying to jeopardise their sale by posting that it wasn't needed / too expensive / etc. Hence these being removed.


Not the first time you've tried to do this either.


The for sale board isn't a place to have a chat and criticise people's items for sale. That's incredibly poor etiquette.

Actually, a properly moderated forum does not offer unlimited freedom of speech - there are certain things said which, whilst not illegal, are nevertheless unhelpful, untrue or unnecessarily rude - and of course there are some things said which are, or may be, a breach of the law. The fact that Admin has put forward his reasoning in this case is helpful, as it helps clarify the moderating policy in this instance. In those parts of the forum where 'discussion' is expected a wide range of different views are allowed. But even these must and should be moderated. On occasion it is annoying where a legitimate view is 'lost' because it has formed part of a wider debate which is off topic or may even be verging (e.g. issues sub judice) on a breach of the law, where the view, expressed solus, would make no sense. But that's what good moderators sometimes need to do.

The general rules are caveat emptor, that is, that it is the buyer or potential buyer that needs to do due diligence. That may include more general research, but it is not up to others to editorialize a small ads page!


Other, perhaps, to indicate where you know from personal experience that a seller is not to be trusted, through e.g. non delivery or false description. Which doesn't include selling something that you wouldn't buy.


Had a poster, I suppose, asked whether something was good value or worth buying you could, reasonably, comment. But not as a gratuitous insertion. And it's not a question most would pose on a small ads site itself.

  • Administrator

For full disclosure, this was the topic where ken78's comments were deleted: https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/viewtopic.php?t=2288796


The seller is trying to sell a professional knife sharpening machine. The seller even posted links to other places where the same device sells for full retail price. Its a totally legitimate listing.


ken78's deleted posts were along the lines of 'this tool isn't needed / too expensive'. There is absolutely no need to make comments like this. The seller has every right to sell items like this on the forum without someone else completely uninvolved in the sale making negative comments about it. If someone is selling an item in bad faith, then you are welcome to report the post, but in this case there is absolutely nothing wrong with the listing.


There is no specific forum rule saying 'you can't discuss or post negative comments about other people's listings when you have no involvement with it', but it common courtesy that you shouldn't do this. The rule list would be far too long if we had to clarify every single scenario of what is respectful and what isn't.

the seller said it had only be used a few times, then it worked out it was used in his business by an apprentice so it was well used and as i have used one of these in my trade as a butcher i know the stones DO WEAR OUT but the sell never said this so as i said the seller was misleading buyers on this forum and i was in the wrong ? i put up the links of this as well

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...