Visit out new Tradespeople Directory! ×

Recommendation for handyman/fence renovator

By mitch_ems
May 3, 2013 in Request a Tradesperson

Recommended Posts

mitch_ems

Posted May 3, 2013

- Share

Posted May 3, 2013

Hello. I wanted to add to the list of recommendations for terry who has done an amazing, and gruelling task, of jet spraying our fences to look like new. They were in a terrible state and we had been thinking about replacing them. All that plus helping me put up a Wendy hose, repair some of the fence, put up some shelves, remove some mould from a humidifier.....and deal calmly and kindly with our children's endless questions. Thank you terry! 07717572036

Link to comment

https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/31871-recommendation-for-handymanfence-renovator/

Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

Advertise Here
Latest Discussions
- Has David Lammy been watching Judge Judy?
  
  By HeadNun · Posted 40 minutes ago
  
  Yes and I heard the other day that there is a higher conviction rate with trials heard by only a judge, vs juries, which makes sense when you think about it. Also - call me cynical - I can't help but think that this justice reform story was thrown out to overshadow the Reeves / OBR / Budget story. But I do agree with scrapping juries for fraud cases.
- Has David Lammy been watching Judge Judy?
  
  By Sephiroth · Posted 48 minutes ago
  
  judges are, by definition, a much narrower strata of society. The temptation to "rattle through" numbers, regardless of right, wrong or justice is fundamentally changed If we trust judges that much, why have we ever bothered with juries in the first place? (that's a rhetorical question btw - there is no sane answer which goes along the lines of "good point, judges only FTW"
- Has David Lammy been watching Judge Judy?
  
  By HeadNun · Posted 1 hour ago
  
  Ah yes, of course, I'd forgotten that the cases will be heard by judges and not Mags. But how does losing juries mean less work for barristers, though? Surely all the other problems (no courtrooms, loos, witnesses etc etc) that stop cases going to trial, or slow trials down - will still exist? Then they'll still be billing the same?
- Has David Lammy been watching Judge Judy?
  
  By CPR Dave · Posted 1 hour ago
  
  It's not magistrates that are needed, it's judges and they will rattle through these cases whether the loos are working or not. Barristers get a brief fee and a day rate.

Sign In