Jump to content

My builder covered my stopcock, HELP?


mmag

Recommended Posts

Hey I had some work done in my bathroom and the builder tiled over my stopcock! The builder does not want to take responsibility for this. What made matters worse was I had a water leak yesterday and was not able to turn off the water. Does anyone know if this breaks regulations of any kind?


Thanks in advance for any suggestions.

mmag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hey I had some work done in my bathroom and the

> builder tiled over my stopcock!.. What

> made matters worse was I had a water leak

> yesterday ..

>

> Thanks in advance for any suggestions.


Oh dear, that sounds very painful & I would definitely see a doctor about it.

- May I recommend The Gardens Surgery, I hear they are very good :O)

Hello mmag,


If the stop cock is not accessable it is breaching the Water Regulations 1991. During a leak your only other option (if it is a tap fed from the mains supply and not an internal tank), is to access the water shut-off on the street boundry!!


Basically, if it is mains water rather than tank fed, the seriousness of it is greater. If a tank, there will be other methods in place to close the supply before it leaves the tank. If mains and there are no other shut-off options in place (ie service valves), Thames Water take this more seriously due to the water wastage factor.


Try and investigate the following site and see if you can contact them for advice http://www.wras.co.uk/regulations_default.asp


Good luck. If you need us to fix it, PM me!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Try oru space with Michelle. Think it runs on Wednesday evenings. She’s great. I also think the new casa core place does one but haven’t tried it. 
    • The OP is simply asking a question? and as a few people on this forum seem to know about every subject posted 🙄 maybe that was the reason for asking?😉 It's been such a dry summer so far, maybe "some trees" are becoming less stable due to lack of rainfall and needed some safety pollarding work?  (another question🙂)  
    • No offence, but why not start from the assumption that the trees team in Southwark Council know what they're doing because it's their job and aren't a bunch of ecogenocidal maniacs looking for excuses to cut back trees? I'm not an expert but if they're not coming back to cut down the rest, then it seems like pollarding. It always looks ugly at first. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pollarding
    • It looks like the branches overhung the entry way to the toilets. There's a lot of paranoia about at the moment about branch drop after a couple of sad accidents which have happened recently where beloved trees were propped up but still dropped branches then everyone jumps up and asks why nothing was done before. You might remember when the massive oak fell over in Peckham Rye by the skating park, thankfully no one was hurt.  I've noticed notices in almost every public space warning about branch drop and some trees have had barriers put underneath them etc. These things seem to come into vogue and then pass again.  I expect local authorities in their regular meetings have all been discussing their risk exposure and issues of corporate responsibility etc....and someone will have been assigned the task (and responsibility) of making everything all right. Perhaps this tree fell victim to that. I doubt there is malice and something they feel is safer/appropriate etc will take its place in due course.  I don't doubt cutting it back is an over reaction but at the same time we all bellow at them when things go wrong so there is a difficult path to navigate. It was a chestnut by the look of it, so not particularly rare I have plenty of saplings growing through my beds if they wish to replace like for like.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...