Jump to content

East Dulwich 'ED' CPZ Review - Closes 2 Jan 2023


Administrator

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator

With the recent lack of service from Royal Mail, some people may have missed receiving letters about the consultation for changes to the East Dulwich 'ED' CPZ. There was a thread here about the nearby PW (Peckham West) CPZ consultation a few weeks ago but I haven't seen one specifically for the ED CPZ changes.


I have been asked by a representative from Southwark Council to post it here just in case anyone wasn't aware.


The consultation survey is open now and closes 2 Jan 2023


Link to details and survey here: https://consultations.southwark.gov.uk/environment-leisure/ed-review/



Map of ED CPZ:

ed-zone.png

No letter either. Given the woeful mail service the council may have to extend the consultation period.


Clearly a huge effort to extend CPZ underway.

 

I agree, they are obviously looking to extend days or hours


As it was supposed to deter commuters why isn't it a short one or two hours during the middle of the day ?

It is a case of shifting goalposts. They have stated they want the whole of Southwark CPZ by 2025. I think this was said at that last disgraceful council planning meeting, where Cllr Rose aka "shouter Rose" went off on one and Leader, Kieron Williams, made misleading claims about the results of recent elections giving the council a mandate.


A few years ago it was all about saving parking spaces for residents near the train station. The narrative then was that residents were being stalked by evil commuters in cars trying to snitch their parking spaces.


There will also probably be unnecessary extension of yellow lines too, sometime soon.

Surprise, suprise. Tried to fill the survey out and it would not accept my answers.


Perhaps they are trying to limit answers to only those living within the CPZ area?


If I recall, anyone, even those living in other boroughs (cycle groups) were able to participate in support of CPZ.


Anyhow, there is a technical glitch with this survey and it is not working as it should.


Admin, could you perhaps let the council know, since they asked you to post it?

The questions ask about the CPZ in 'your area', so it sounds like they only want responses from those who live in the roads listed. I didn't have a problem filling it out, no glitches for me.


 

Surprise, suprise. Tried to fill the survey out and it would not accept my answers.


Perhaps they are trying to limit answers to only those living within the CPZ area?


If I recall, anyone, even those living in other boroughs (cycle groups) were able to participate in support of CPZ.


Anyhow, there is a technical glitch with this survey and it is not working as it should.


Admin, could you perhaps let the council know, since they asked you to post it?

Well, if that is the case it should be clearly stated. Do you live on a CPZ road in the yellow area?


In the box for roads, it says if your road is not listed put it in.


I live in ED "the area" affected by CPZ and my road is contiguous with a road that is affected by CPZ. Therefore, if say hours are extended and there is overspill my road is/will be affected.


I think if only those in the yellow area are consulted it is pretty disingenuous and many roads in ED are affected by CPZ even if their road is not a CPZ.


Once more, when the council was looking for support for CPZ literally anyone in the Borough could participate and respond.

Surprise, suprise. Tried to fill the survey out and it would not accept my answers.


Perhaps they are trying to limit answers to only those living within the CPZ area?...there is a technical glitch with this survey and it is not working as it should.

 

Nope, it's working fine for me. Problem may be at your end.

DKHB,


Maybe my end. But what could cause it? Did you reply by phone, or laptop? I'm on a notebook.


Are you inside the yellow area and is your street on the list? If it is only those within the yellow area who can reply we need to know.

 

Working fine for me (laptop, Chrome browser).

There's a drop down list which covers the roads within the CPZ and a sentence saying "if your road is not listed, please put your road in the box below" and you can type in anything, it's freetext.


It's a way of easily separating out inside and outside CPZ but it allows anyone to respond.


Hope that helps.

  • 1 month later...

Just a FYI, CPZs came up in this week’s overview and scrutiny committee meeting going through next year’s budget, seems pretty clear that there will be a borough wide roll out over the next two years.



1:48:30 ish onward.


They seem to be forecasting £1.3 million extra in CPZ and parking enforcement income next year, even though this is slightly randomly described as savings from Active Travel (it’s listed in the income generation document so I think it is actually additional income).


Not quite sure what the point of the consultations are when income is already included in the budget? Presumably the amounts budgeted take account of timed restrictions? If you have longer timed restrictions on your street do you pay more/ less than shorter ones? I have no idea...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • No doubt the schools in Harrogate are being discussed on the East Harrogate Forum or whatever. Dulwich College is being discussed because it's local. Saying "ooh, there were loads of schools mentioned" is a bit dismissive. It was Dulwich College that referred sex abuse allegations about pupils to the police and Dulwich College that used the spectre of the police to suppress dissent. 🤔
    • Hi, I was just wondering what experiences any of you have had in relation to an Independent Panel review relating to the Permanent Exclusion of a SEN child. 1. General experience Any experiences, positive or negative, in general? 2. Clerks Associates UK Any experience of this entity acting as an "independent clerk" to an Independent Review Panel in a matter involving a Permanent Exclusion of a SEN pupil, also involving discrimination under the Equality Act 2010. There is limited publicly available information with regards to this "independent clerk"; however, I can see from their Annual Report & Accounts at Companies House that they are a small, privately owned organisation.   I am very concerned that there is a clear and material risk that they are highly dependent for their revenues and cash flow from the business that they receive from the school and its parent Trust (which has 9 schools in total under its management) who have appointed them. I also note that the Trust has a material employee relations dispute with their staff over underpayment of maternity pay whilst materially increasing the salaries of the highest paid Trust executives and other highly paid staff (presumably the Head Teachers). https://southwarknews.co.uk/news/community/teachers-at-six-charter-schools-walk-out-in-first-of-four-strike-days-planned-for-this-month/ Given the current situation, we have no choice but to engage in this process of an Independent Panel Review; however, we are concerned as to various elements including this one which is a key role in providing independence. 3. Independent SEN expert We have the right to an independent SEN expert to review the matter and provide their opinion to the Independent Review Panel. The concept is that this person is supposedly acting "independently" and also solely in respect of the SEN elements of the matter. We do not however know who this person is, their experience or level of independence. The last information that I can find in the public domain about the effectiveness of an Independent SEN expert is a UK govt report from 2014 which portrays a very mixed experience for parents. Hence, we are seeking to understand if anyone has any more recent experience of an Independent SEN expert in relation to an Independent Panel Review. Many thanks for any thoughts that you have based on your experience. For reasons of confidentiality, it is perhaps better to send any replies to me directly. Many thanks
    • Hang in there, friends. Most of us appreciate that you're trying you best and these companies are a nightmare!
    • I agree about the site and buying another one, but I was responding to a query about the old site. Which was no longer fit for purpose. Selling that and not buying another locally was just money for old rope for the foreign owners, as was moving the DO to an unsuitable building too far away. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...