Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have been diagnosed with anxiety in the past and have had both medication and CBT on the NHS. Both 'worked' to an extent in different ways. I've read paco's post and the process it describes sounds similar to CBT.


Like a previous poster, I am uncomfortable with the 'peddling of (expensive) wares' on a thread that's a cry for help and advice. I agree that there are actions that you can take to begin to tackle your problems, but suggest that the first port of call should be your GP / other free NHS services (health visitors etc) who can provide access to FREE therapy etc.


Extra financial pressures are the last thing you need when you're suffering from anxiety, depression, etc.


When I was post-partum / in the midst of anxiety and panic attacks pre-baby, I was desperate and suggestible. The vulnerable and suggestible are a good market to sell expensive goods / services to. So I do find it inappropriate that this is taking place on this thread (even if it is well-intentioned).

There is another very good reason for making a sympathtic GP your first place to seek profession help, if professional help is what you want. That reason is that your GP should order blood tests which could help rule out other health issues such as thyroid, low iron, or low Vit D, etc. While not being the cause of anxiety/depression outright, these conditions can exacerbate underlying problems. If after that you want to explore other avenues of treatment, by all means there are many to choose from.


SarahG, your post seems genuine enough, but keep in mind that there have been cases of people posting disingenuous comments on local forums. So suffice it to say that making blanket statements about the curative powers of any treatment (NHS or private) aimed at vulnerable individuals, is always going to met with some skepticism. xx

Agree with Saffron.


Do not want to throw doubt on the good intentions of anyone on this thread, but someone very close to me suffers from (among other things) severe, chronic anxiety. I accompanied this person to a consultation with a professor of psychology at a London teaching hospital. His advice was very clear that there is very good evidence to support the effectiveness of drug therapy and/or CBT for most (obviously, not all) sufferers of anxiety AND that the evidence is that any other type of therapy (which is not, broadly, aimed at giving you SKILLS, or helping you work out effective coping strategies) is actually counterproductive. He was particularly clear that psychotherapies, for example aimed at making connections between childhood experiences and current anxiety, have been shown to make some forms of anxiety worse.


This is my exact (vicarious) experience with my loved one, who IMO has become hooked on a therapist who gives him what he wants, which is lots of reinforcement that his anxious/negative world view is justified (and supports his ignoring medical advice about treatment), when this obviously isn't helping his symptoms.


I don't want to scare or aggravate anyone's anxiety by saying this. In a sense, any treatment which you find helpful is helpful to you. But I do question the legitimacy of a lot of private "therapy" when nowadays evidenced based options are widely available on the NHS.

I haven't read through all the responses, so apologies if someone has mentioned this before, but several months after my second was born I started feeling increasingly irrational and anxious about everything (much more than just the postpartum emotional roller coaster, and eventually I discovered that my thyroid was barely functioning. I'm sure that not all people who have underactive thyroid experience anxiety and vice versa, but it is a good thing to have checked just in case (and also all those B vitamins). I hope you can get some help, in any form. You are certainly not alone.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • why do we think we have the right for the elected local council to be transparent?
    • Granted Shoreditch is still London, but given that the council & organisers main argument for the festival is that it is a local event, for local people (to use your metaphor), there's surprisingly little to back this up. As Blah Blah informatively points out, this is now just a commercial venture with no local connection. Our park is regarded by them as an asset that they've paid to use & abuse. There's never been any details provided of where the attendees are from, but it's still trotted out as a benefit to the local community.  There's never been any details provided of any increase in sales for local businesses, but it's still trotted out as a benefit to the local community.  There's promises of "opportunities" for local people & traders to work at the festival, but, again, no figures to back this up. And lastly, the fee for the whole thing goes 100% to running the Events dept, and the dozens of free events that no-one seems able to identify, and, yes, you guessed it - no details provided for by the council. So again, no tangible benefit for the residents of the area.
    • I mean I hold no portfolio to defend Gala,  but I suspect that is their office.  I am a company director,  my home address is also not registered with Companies House. Also guys this is Peckham not Royston Vasey.  Shoreditch is a mere 20 mins away by train, it's not an offshore bolt hole in Luxembourg.
    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...