Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We are putting together an ebook about all the things people like (or even don't like) about living and/or working in and around East Dulwich.


Would you like your views and comments to be included?


Can you write anything from 1-500 words (whatever you can manage)?


You can write about your favourite event, place to eat/drink or perhaps where you like to relax.


Just type up your contributions and send them across in an email.


If you are a business or organisation then we can include your business name, address and website. If you are an individual then please send us any information that you would like included next to you comments.


Everyone who contributes will be given an opportunity to download the finished ebook for FREE on the Amazon Kindle platform.


Closing date for your contributions is Friday 17th May 2013 at 5pm.


Please email [email protected]

ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> > Would you like your views and comments to be

> included?

> No

>

> > Can you write anything from 1-500 words

> (whatever you can manage)?

> Yes

> /ends



Thanks ianr - however we do need to them be included if you submit your comments.

the-e-dealer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Don't wish to discourage but won't it it look like

> a book knocked up in 4 days with such a short

> deadline.


That's the deadline for your views and comments. The book will be compiled after they are in. Thanks

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Arguably, as regards local needs for free(er) flowing traffic and some acknowledgement of expressed wishes he hasn't been. The 'active travel' and particularly the cycling lobby seems to have got far more of his attention than others. In that aspect, at least he would seem to be far more likely to be happy amongst the avowedly private-car hating Greens. A perfectly reasonable stance, of course, but one which certainly doesn't qualify as 'arguing for local needs'. He hasn't, equally, been very obviously supportive of those, his direct constituents I believe, who have been less than enthusiastic about Gala.
    • The problem with the first Southwark leadership election is that two proxy votes were cast, which is against Southwark's own party rules. So that is why the election was re-run. The controversy is in switching to an online as opposed to in person second election. James has causes he vehemently stands for, and it's fair enough if he thinks the local Labour Party is no longer for him. Government is not easy, and there are hard decisions to be made always. London councils have always had a better deal when it comes to central funding, and anyone who travels to the North frequently can see the stark difference. It's that failure to see the bigger picture that I find most surprising about his comments. Sure, as a local councillor he should be always arguing for local needs, but reform of central government funding to give more help to poorer regions has been a long held aim by this Labour Party, and especially since Brexit, where poorer regions benefitting from EU grants lost out.  As always, it will be the public that decides at the ballot box. 
    • I'd be interested to know how else you award points when deciding what party to vote for!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...