Jump to content

Calling All Cars!


the-e-dealer

Recommended Posts

I think what much of this is because people don't like their negative but comfortable habits challenged, so they grasp onto whatever they can to prevent themselves having to look at their behaviour and it's impact on others.


It's clear that currently switching from car to other healthier / less socially destructive transport modes would inconvenience many people quite seriously, but if there is no change in people's attitude to car ownership and use, there will be a pretty crappy future facing all our kids, SEN or not, especially in our cities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not ignoring. Busy.


There are many forms of disability, not all of them physical, not all of them visible. An SEN can be a disability in as much as it can be a barrier to access something such as education, social events and interacting with the community.


To answer your question, a child with say a learning disability which is classed as having special education needs, may be capable of walking but may refuse to do so. They may choose to walk on tiptoes and/or backwards. Maybe the child has no fear or understanding of danger and could run into the road at anytime, despite having their hand held.


There are many reasons why a child who has SEN may need to be driven to school besides the reasons of distance, going on to work etc that any parent may face. Could be that after struggling to get the child to co-operate with getting ready for school, eat breakfast or even leave the house the parent/carer is to exhausted to try and face the ordeal of walking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"There are many reasons why a child who has SEN may need to be driven to school besides the reasons of distance, going on to work etc that any parent may face."


That may be true, but it is still no answer, unless you think, for example, that these account for all/the majority of kids currently being driven to local schools. As has been said, at the point of entry it's likely that all kids will live < 5-600 metres from the school. Some will genuinely need to be driven, for various reasons. The majority won't, and I think it's a fair perception that many of those who currently are don't need to be - it's certainly my impression from dropping my own kids off. In those circumstances it's difficult to argue seriously against LadyD's basic point i.e. for some parents driving their kids to school is just putting their own, selfish interests above the wider interests of their community (and perhaps the interests of their own kids).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for answering my question bluecanary.


I agree that disabled kids might need to be driven to school, although my friend pushed her severely autistic / blind daughter to school in an oversize buggy, but what you said here:




To answer your question, a child with say a learning disability which is classed as having special education needs, may be capable of walking but may refuse to do so. They may choose to walk on tiptoes and/or backwards. Maybe the child has no fear or understanding of danger and could run into the road at anytime, despite having their hand held.


There are many reasons why a child who has SEN may need to be driven to school besides the reasons of distance, going on to work etc that any parent may face. Could be that after struggling to get the child to co-operate with getting ready for school, eat breakfast or even leave the house the parent/carer is to exhausted to try and face the ordeal of walking.


applies to loads of non-SEN kids, including two of mine who were hyperactive.


You just adapt the way you do things, including telling the teachers that you won't let them browbeat you into forcing your child to have a horrible morning by shouting at them & rushing them to be on time for the benefit of the school's OFTED statistics on timekeeping.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely even if a child has SEN, that's no excise to park illegally, and get a parking fine?


SEN aside, I know a lot of people who choose to drive to school simply because they (not the kids) are too lazy to walk. We are at Goodrich, I know people who drive that live on Friern, and towards the shops on Forest Hill Rd - a 5/10 minute walk at most.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

(Kids with disabilities who can't walk to school can get transport from the council). My kids went to a primary school 15 minutes walk from home. My next door neighbour's kids went to the same school and unless I walked them (if they were ready) their mother used to drive them- and that was most days. And they were still late most days!!

Also at the school was a girl in a wheelchair and her mother used to drive her, park on the zig-zags to unload her and then drive to shopping where she parked in a disabled space since she had the parking badge!! Both were 'Dulwich Village mums'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It was an absolute shit show. And so much anger coming from both sides, not becoming at all (was surprised how riled cool Rishi was getting).  Agree about the format, it was lazy, whatsherchops wasn't asking pertinent questions, she was just going for binary yesses or nos. The producers didn't force either side to drill down on anything, just make commitments so they got good soundbites.  If I hear 'my father was a tool maker' / my wife's a nurse / my father was a GP one more time... as if any of those things qualify anyone to fix / understand anything. 
    • Good.  Subsidence claims generally have an excess of £1000 per claim, but was yours higher?
    • Indeed, many house here have had or will have subsidence issues so one needs to bear that in mind.  Many houses here have shallow foundations but they have been around 100 years or so without too much issue. What the surveyor has told you doesn't feel like a 'red flag', more of a sensible warning.  Bear in mind that although the surveyor is nominally working for you, their focus iln reality is mostly on the lender and the risk of being sued, either by them or you.  So they are always pretty cautious.  It would be wise to get a 2nd opinion, eg. from a structural engineer.  Or talk  to the original surveyor directly as they may say more than they are prepared to put in a report.  It's a little difficult from the description to identify what the situation is but the scenario in which part of a property has been underpinned and the rest has not is fairly common here.  The proximity of trees is likely to be the main thing to be concerned about, particularly after the hot summer of 2002, as insurers generally regard them as risky, especially if they are not cut back from time to time.  A second surveyor can advise directly on this. It would definitely be worth trying to take over the current buildings insurance.  Indeed, it may be quite hard to find new cover.  Enquire what the current premium is and who the policy is ultiimately underwitten by (ie. is it a name that you have ever heard of?)  The insurance industry, in general, works to a guideline that the insurance of an underpinned property should transfer to a new owner.   https://www.biba.org.uk/insurance-guides/home-insurance-guides/subsidence/
    • More than the 2 contestants, the format and production was the main fault last night - allowing 45 seconds for an answer will get you those responses from any 2 candidates Awful show
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...