Jump to content

The Dulwich Bike Meet


v79moto

Recommended Posts

The Dulwich Bike Meet, powered by V79moto


Custom Motorcycles, Curated Retail, Great Coffee & Quality Street-food!


Come join us on the first bike meet in Dulwich, where you can meet fellow riders, show off your pride and joy while enjoying some hot drinks and nibbles from local businesses.


The event will take place at the Trevor Bailey Sports Ground Dulwich Common, London, SE21 on the 26th March, 2023. Starting at 11am until 5pm.


This is a family-friendly environment, where we celebrate the world of motorcycling and everyone is welcome, so bring your family, your friends and your pets!


Carl Rosner Motorcyles will be displaying some of Triumph's latest models for your viewing pleasure!


There will be a variety of food and drinks stalls from local businesses at the ready.


Parking is available, and don’t worry, you don’t need ride a motorcycle, you can come by foot, cycle in or drive.


Book Your Free Ticket Here:

https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/the-dulwich-bike-meet-tickets-523098470607


We can't wait to see you there!!

EastDulwichForum-Image.jpg.cdd2c3f2a4e2d325a424fe1e7239df19.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/322685-the-dulwich-bike-meet/
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Its crazy, they raise membership prices due to the refurb but things are worse than before.
    • That example seems fair enough - but wouldn’t say it’s completely analogous to the Trump situation the STORY (your caps) is about the bbc edit precisely because of what happened that day and people’s ability to brush it under the carpet. I think the edit didn’t  need to be done in that way to make the exact same point. So it’s wrong thing to do, but it isn’t actually incorrect in its point - and people should be reexamining the events and not the edit  and I don’t think it’s political to say or do this. If your supporter example played out that way then fair enough - I just cannot agree that in this case the edit fundamentally changes what he said, meant or did  - especially without events transpired   It could definitely be made more explicit but given what actually happened… ? At least hopefully at this point we are being less aggy with each other and trying to make our points 
    • But THE STORY is about a BBC edit, and its impartiality issues, not about the storming of the capital. And it's not the first time deceitful editing has been a story - there was the whole Queen scandal too.  I love the BBC and hate seeing the corporation frankly unable to remain impartial anymore. It breaks my heart, because we do have a higher standard in this country and that's what keeps us on the right side of history - not people like Trump.  A long time ago I made a film about a Trump supporter. I came into the edit one day and the editor and edited him to say something quite bigoted, which he simply never said. Luckily I spotted it. The editor's excuse was 'well it's the kind of thing he would say'. I made him take it out, because it was dishonest and you have to leave your politics at the door if you want to be a good documentarian. 
    • Showers are still cold today.  When I asked at Reception, I was told that one of the boilers was now repaired and they were just waiting for the water to warm up!  The pool was pretty cold today as well,  Still a load of grit /dirt on the bottom, seems to be getting worse.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...