Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Today there's a feature about 97% of academic papers agreeing that climate change is manmade, here http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2013/may/16/climate-change-scienceofclimatechange


to which you can add your own questions and reflections.


Just a reminder that one thing humanity CAN do is start replacing trees in every possible site, but especially along seaboards, to anchor the shoreline. Wide bands of trees, planted by the acre, just inland actually set up conditions that help regulate rainfall. All along riversides we will need to anchor topsoil far better, restoring watermeadows. Rivers will be violently in spate thanks to more storms, & they need to be accommodated within flood plains as our ancestors knew full well.


We need not leave it to others to grow the trees, but each of us start saving and potting on saplings, even if we have limited space. They will be wanted en masse in another decade - no need to plant them into the earth just yet. Please include all sorts of ordinary 'weed' trees that start off accidentally in your garden borders and paving, such as sycamore, ash, holly, elder, hazel, willow.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/32296-academe-and-climate-change/
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Yep, of course I do - did you not read the bit from the survey about the noise having a negative impact on foraging bats? And like @Angelina I'm aware it affects other people, and if no one complains then it gives them an argument that's it's all ok.  The tree in question was a cherry that everyone loves, didn't need to be touched, and the council admitted was a mistake and shouldn't have happened.  The council and Gala use the 'local' narrative as a benefit, without any figures to back it up. It is used as an argument for the event to go ahead, when there's no basis of fact. The attendees are clearly not local as they've proved they don't give a **** about the area. The council do tell us where the money is spent - 100% on running the Events dept, and a myriad of unlisted free events. They just don't tell us how much, so that we can make an informed decision on whether the gain is with the pain.  Sorry, what was your point again?
    • Leon came this evening and did a small job.  He was able to fit me, which I’m grateful for.  He arrived when he said he would. Very professional & friendly guy, offered great advice and very reasonable prices.  Highly recommend Leon! 👍  
    • Thanks, that's quite big, isn't it?
    • Lots of people are concerned about the impact on the environment.  I’m not personally bothered by the noise but I know people are and I will therefore lend my support in challenging the management and location of the event.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...