Jump to content

Cinema - Forest Hill / Sydenham Dulwich


Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone,


We are considering opening a local indpendent cinema in the Forest Hill / Sydenham / Dulwich area and we wanted to discuss the idea with the local residents, hence this post. We are hoping to open something that is somewhat quirky and lively that has an interesting programming schedule not only the usual Hollywood blockbusters. Our aim is for it to become a preferred alternative to Odeon/Cineworld for the locals.


We would really appreciate if you would take the time to fill out a survey by clicking the link below, it is only 10 questions. We really appreciate your time. Also please feel free to comment on this thread as to the type of films you enjoy, locations and any other suggestions you think suitable.


http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/5ZKMWVN


Have a great day,


Many thanks,


The Film Mill Team

Me too. I think anywhere local needs to offer something a bit different to attract me away, especially if it isn't Dulwich as it will be further away than Peckham Plex.


It's not going to compete with Peckham Plex on price or Surrey Keys on convenient of having a huge car park, or central London on convenience for meeting friends from other parts of London.


I'd like somewhere that feels a bit more indulgent than the average cinema - can buy a glass of wine and more grown up snacks to take in, not just buckets of popcorn or pic and mix. Give me nuts, olives etc.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Yes and I heard the other day that there is a higher conviction rate with trials heard by only a judge, vs juries, which makes sense when you think about it.  Also - call me cynical - I can't help but think that this justice reform story was thrown out to overshadow the Reeves / OBR / Budget story.  But I do agree with scrapping juries for fraud cases. 
    • judges are, by definition, a much narrower strata of society. The temptation to "rattle through" numbers, regardless of right, wrong or justice is fundamentally changed If we trust judges that much, why have we ever bothered with juries in the first place? (that's a rhetorical question btw - there is no sane answer which goes along the lines of "good point, judges only FTW"
    • Ah yes, of course, I'd forgotten that the cases will be heard by judges and not Mags. But how does losing juries mean less work for barristers, though? Surely all the other problems (no courtrooms, loos, witnesses etc etc) that stop cases going to trial, or slow trials down - will still exist? Then they'll still be billing the same? 
    • It's not magistrates that are needed, it's judges and they will rattle through these cases whether the loos are working or not. Barristers get a brief fee and a day rate. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...