Visit out new Tradespeople Directory! ×

EXPERIENCED TEACHER/TUTOR/NANNY - looking for work

By caitmerry
May 21, 2013 in Request a Tradesperson

Recommended Posts

caitmerry

Posted May 21, 2013

- Share

Posted May 21, 2013

Hello,

I am starting a teaching position with Teach First at the end of June and am looking for part-time work from now until then.

I am an experienced teaching assistant for SEN children and have done volunteer work with many youth charities. I have many younger cousins who I have looked after, and have been a nanny for a family friend. I am also an experienced pianist and piano teacher, and am highly qualified academically having completed two undergraduate degrees and a masters.

I am looking for any work nannying, tutoring (GCSEs, A-levels, SATs, LNATs, English Language, etc.) or teaching piano. My specialties are English, Law, Citizenship, the Humanities, Science and ICT; however, I have a great amount of knowledge of other subjects as well.

I am 27 years old and am a responsible, friendly, people-oriented person, with a great amount of enthusiasm. I am also very organised and have a great amount of experience with young people.

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.

Many thanks,

Caitlyn Merry

Link to comment

https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/32481-experienced-teachertutornanny-looking-for-work/

Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

Advertise Here
Latest Discussions
- Has David Lammy been watching Judge Judy?
  
  By HeadNun · Posted 1 hour ago
  
  Yes and I heard the other day that there is a higher conviction rate with trials heard by only a judge, vs juries, which makes sense when you think about it. Also - call me cynical - I can't help but think that this justice reform story was thrown out to overshadow the Reeves / OBR / Budget story. But I do agree with scrapping juries for fraud cases.
- Has David Lammy been watching Judge Judy?
  
  By Sephiroth · Posted 1 hour ago
  
  judges are, by definition, a much narrower strata of society. The temptation to "rattle through" numbers, regardless of right, wrong or justice is fundamentally changed If we trust judges that much, why have we ever bothered with juries in the first place? (that's a rhetorical question btw - there is no sane answer which goes along the lines of "good point, judges only FTW"
- Has David Lammy been watching Judge Judy?
  
  By HeadNun · Posted 1 hour ago
  
  Ah yes, of course, I'd forgotten that the cases will be heard by judges and not Mags. But how does losing juries mean less work for barristers, though? Surely all the other problems (no courtrooms, loos, witnesses etc etc) that stop cases going to trial, or slow trials down - will still exist? Then they'll still be billing the same?
- Has David Lammy been watching Judge Judy?
  
  By CPR Dave · Posted 2 hours ago
  
  It's not magistrates that are needed, it's judges and they will rattle through these cases whether the loos are working or not. Barristers get a brief fee and a day rate.

Sign In