Jump to content

Recommendation for driving instructor


Recommended Posts

Hi all,

Just wanted to give a heads up to anyone lookig for a driving instructor in our area, I've just passed my test using Nicolas driving academy he's a great instructor and manages to fit a lesson in even if he's very booked up! Very patient and also does extra lesson after the test like a motorway driving which helped me gain a bit of confidence!


www.nicholasdrivingacademy.co.uk

  • 3 weeks later...
Hi there, I recently asked Michael from the Driving Academy to help get me through the test - I've been driving for more than 15 years in America and abroad but finally had to get my proper UK driver's license - even though I do have some driving experience with manual and on the left side of the road, i was a bit nervous, never having driven in London proper - Michael was great and the only one (I spoke to two other instructors before I chose him) who didn't try to make me feel bad and less confident and push me more lessons. I would strongly recommend him - you can reach him at 079 5647 7626.

Hi,


I would also like to recommend Nick of www.nicholasdrivingacademy.co.uk. He has been fantastic by getting me to the standard of driving that I am currently at. Although I have not passed yet I'm well on my way and Nick says I will be ready for a test by the end of the summer. I previously did an intensive course which was not for me and lost a bit of confidence due to this. Nick set me straight after a few lessons.


Highly recommended 07956221706


Ken

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Yes and I heard the other day that there is a higher conviction rate with trials heard by only a judge, vs juries, which makes sense when you think about it.  Also - call me cynical - I can't help but think that this justice reform story was thrown out to overshadow the Reeves / OBR / Budget story.  But I do agree with scrapping juries for fraud cases. 
    • judges are, by definition, a much narrower strata of society. The temptation to "rattle through" numbers, regardless of right, wrong or justice is fundamentally changed If we trust judges that much, why have we ever bothered with juries in the first place? (that's a rhetorical question btw - there is no sane answer which goes along the lines of "good point, judges only FTW"
    • Ah yes, of course, I'd forgotten that the cases will be heard by judges and not Mags. But how does losing juries mean less work for barristers, though? Surely all the other problems (no courtrooms, loos, witnesses etc etc) that stop cases going to trial, or slow trials down - will still exist? Then they'll still be billing the same? 
    • It's not magistrates that are needed, it's judges and they will rattle through these cases whether the loos are working or not. Barristers get a brief fee and a day rate. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...