But a larger number, in a more hotly contested election, didn't. It is an anomaly that Starmer won a landslide in seats with a turnout for Labour which would have shamed Labour leaders in all the 21st and much of the post war 20th century.
I was not suggesting anything else!
I'm not sure how you interpret what I said as "irrelevant"?
I was responding to a post saying that Corbyn was "unelectable".
My point was that a large number of the electorate voted for him!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.