Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sadly the law presupposes delivery based on date of posting (oh, when that was true!). You could request of Ms Hayes some confirmation that poor and missed deliveries have been a continuing problem locally for some time which she has been struggling against - it may be that a letter of support from your MP could help any plea of mitigation, but you will be able to 'prove' nothing.

This is part of the ongoing disgrace that the private and mainly foreign owned company quite wrongly, in my opinion, trading under the name 'Royal' Mail has become. And its Regulators, knowing full well that it had failed its service obligations still allow it to trade.

It is true that there is an accepted deemed receipt in law. However, there has been some discussion regarding where postal strikes/covid, for example, cause delay in receipt causing detriment: see link to potentially helpful article - https://www.peoplemanagement.co.uk/article/1808201/postal-strikes-delay-important-legal-documents-–-does-hr-need-know which deals with HR issues but similar situations could be argued by analogy.

Act promptly to notify the other party/tribunal/court etc of the delayed receipt and get some advice as soon as possible. Getting supporting evidence of chronic problems of local postal service, as Penguin suggests, would also be a good idea. You could try getting email confirmation from Post Office of reasons for recent delay i.e. staff illness etc. I chased a parcel recently and the customer services agent could check the recent service record to confirm that there had been staff illness  in the relevant time period.

'

 

 

Edited by IlonaM

I can't promise the result you're hoping for, but when I was in practice I'd always put in representations to see if we could mitigate situations beyond my clients' control. Given the combination of strikes, illness and chronic delay, hopefully there might be some room for understanding and flexibility.

Edited by IlonaM

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Wow I had no idea they give you 5% in perfume for your accommodation. You're right, I need to travel more. 
    • Do none of you go abroad.  Tourist taxes are really common in continental Europe and do vary a lot city by city. They are collected by the hotels/rental apartments. They are usually a  tiny part of your holiday costs.  In Narbonne recently we paid €1.30 per person per night.  The next town we went to charge 80 cents per person per night. By comparison Cologne is 5% of your accomodation.
    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...