Visit out new Tradespeople Directory! ×

Estate agent recommendation

By alimc
May 29, 2013 in Request a Tradesperson

Recommended Posts

alimc

Posted May 29, 2013

- Share

Posted May 29, 2013

Hi all

I don't normally do this but I feel compelled to say something positive about my recent experience with Haarts of Dulwich. We have just bought a house through them and the comparison with the agency we used to sell with is just incredible. Where the sales agency was often rude and terrible at communicating, Haarts couldn't do enough and were always available to answer any question we had no matter how trivial. In particular, I can recommend Tim Holland who went above and beyond and even drove us to our new house on the completion and recommended a really good Indian restaurant for our first night in the house!

A joy to deal with.

Cheers

Link to comment

https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/32739-estate-agent-recommendation/

Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

Advertise Here
Latest Discussions
- Poundland East Dulwich soon to be replaced by Tesco Express
  
  By mitchiner · Posted 1 hour ago
  
  Do you have a link to this? The only one i could find was on the 24th July
- Has David Lammy been watching Judge Judy?
  
  By HeadNun · Posted 3 hours ago
  
  Yes and I heard the other day that there is a higher conviction rate with trials heard by only a judge, vs juries, which makes sense when you think about it. Also - call me cynical - I can't help but think that this justice reform story was thrown out to overshadow the Reeves / OBR / Budget story. But I do agree with scrapping juries for fraud cases.
- Has David Lammy been watching Judge Judy?
  
  By Sephiroth · Posted 3 hours ago
  
  judges are, by definition, a much narrower strata of society. The temptation to "rattle through" numbers, regardless of right, wrong or justice is fundamentally changed If we trust judges that much, why have we ever bothered with juries in the first place? (that's a rhetorical question btw - there is no sane answer which goes along the lines of "good point, judges only FTW"
- Has David Lammy been watching Judge Judy?
  
  By HeadNun · Posted 3 hours ago
  
  Ah yes, of course, I'd forgotten that the cases will be heard by judges and not Mags. But how does losing juries mean less work for barristers, though? Surely all the other problems (no courtrooms, loos, witnesses etc etc) that stop cases going to trial, or slow trials down - will still exist? Then they'll still be billing the same?

Sign In