Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

Just a quick one: if you have a parking permit, be aware when renewing that Southwark's parking account system is incorrectly identifying some ULEZ-compliant vehicles as non-compliant - the fees now differ between the two. I have a ULEZ compliant car and the online system would only give me the option to pay £300 for an annual permit for a non-compliant car, instead of £225. All sorted by doing the renewal by phone.

I'm sure the hike in fees has been well discussed elsewhere. To my mind it goes against the principle that "[Southwark needs] to charge for parking permits to cover the operational costs of the zone", which was as described in the consultation of the zone I live in. The first I knew of the increase was when I went to renew.

GM

Generally local authorities will use the same databases, shared by or purchased from DVLA, possibly with additional fields.  The DVLA one, containing tens of millions of vehicles isn't fool proof, ie there will be the odd error.  ULEZ is based on emissions, and there are some older petrol cars that in theory will be caught as they are not modern enough, but were designed to meet future standards.

What is special/different about your vehicle gm99 - out of interest.  Is it Euro 3 petrol (ULEZ non-compliant) mascarading at a Euro 4 (compliant).

 

 

 

9 hours ago, gm99 said:

I'm sure the hike in fees has been well discussed elsewhere. To my mind it goes against the principle that "[Southwark needs] to charge for parking permits to cover the operational costs of the zone", which was as described in the consultation of the zone I live in.

Unfortunately there is a small, but well organised and vociferous minority who want councils to use resident parking fees as a deterrent to car ownership.   One such group argue that the current cost of a parking permit is below what they consider to be the  market rate.  For Southwark they suggest the fee be raised to  £1333.

https://www.swlondoner.co.uk/news/26052023-central-london-councils-missing-out-on-millions-in-parking-revenue

Southwark council's stated policy is to "force a reduction in vehicles", by which they mean our family cars, not through traffic.  So expect more rises and expansion of CPZs in the future,

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12027415/Labour-council-wages-war-drivers-increasing-cost-permits-368.html

 

8 hours ago, malumbu said:

What is special/different about your vehicle gm99 - out of interest.  Is it Euro 3 petrol (ULEZ non-compliant) mascarading at a Euro 4 (compliant) 

Nothing - it's a Euro 6 diesel and has no issues with the actual ULEZ (ie we're not being charged in error by TFL). A neighbour with a brand new petrol car has had the same overcharging problem and is now trying to get a refund (he was unaware of the error until I alerted him to it). 

Edited by gm99

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
    • Saying one thing so everyone can understand, and something different that only select people can understand is not inclusive, it’s dangerous.  
    • I'm not deliberately swerving anything. What exactly have they said in their communications in languages other than English that you object to? Why would they put those communications in other languages when the whole point was to connect with a specific group of people? Apologies if I've missed your point.
    • The point (which you're swerving) is not that the Greens spread their message in a language other than English - it's what they have said, and why they're shy about saying the same thing in other languages, including English. If a party in Northern Ireland circulates leaflets in Ulster Scots only that tells voters to elect them so they can be a strong Protestant voice, and has videos in Ulster Scots only that seek to discredit the First Minister by showing (a propos of nothing) images of them meeting the Pope - is that inclusivity or sectarianism?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...