Sold Boys clothes bundle 4-5 and 5-8 years, SE27

By ElenaR
June 11, 2023 in The Family Room Classifieds

Recommended Posts

ElenaR

Posted June 11, 2023

- Share

Posted June 11, 2023

Used boy clothes in mostly excellent condition.

Polarn o Pyret green jeans are unworn and are branded as 7-8 years 128cm. They are slim fit.

Paul Smith red zebra top is pristine 4-5.

Rest are from Joules, H&M, Tu, GAP.

Red ironman pyjama set is to fit a child 120cm tall.

Swimming shorts are 3-4 and the green pair has a blue stain as shown in the close up photo.

Tu school grey jumpers are branded as 8 years, 128cm but they would fit a child around 5-6 years of age. They were never worn, arrived too small and I did not return them.

Link to comment

https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/327877-boys-clothes-bundle-4-5-and-5-8-years-se27/

Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

Advertise Here
Latest Discussions
- Stop mega-nursery creating further traffic misery on East Dulwich Grove
  
  By marsie · Posted 5 hours ago
  
  Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
- Councillor McAsh defects to the Greens
  
  By Dogkennelhillbilly · Posted 6 hours ago
  
  This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
- Councillor McAsh defects to the Greens
  
  By malumbu · Posted 6 hours ago
  
  @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
- Will Mandelson be accepted across the pond.
  
  By Insuflo · Posted 6 hours ago
  
  Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.

Sign In