Jump to content

Recommended Posts

57 minutes ago, CPR Dave said:

Why do you think there would be asbestos in the soil underneath this residential building?

The excavation is of the grounds the surrounding the residential building.  The reason why I think it might contain asbestos is because the land contamination report of these grounds said that it might.

The site has had previous demolitions prior to the control of asbestos act - i.e asbestos debris may be there. Also it is likely to have Made ground (ground made of buried debris that sometimes contains asbestos). 

 

37 minutes ago, redpost said:

Yes, push for it to be tested for PCBs, heavy metals, PFOAs, Sarin, Novichok, DDT, Anthrax and the most deadly of all dihydrogen oxide.

Better safe than sorry!

I believe I have a valid concern. If you think I don't then, rather than sarcasm, it would be interesting to hear your reasoning. 

Edited by pinkladybird
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/330070-removed/#findComment-1631824
Share on other sites

I agree, that is quite interesting particularly given the push to build on brownfields sites.

I know nothing at all about this but out of interest just had a read of this blog post which I found quite helpful and links to the industry guidance.  It does seem as though further testing and risk assessment is something that the employers of those on site need to carry out as the project proceeds, rather than something expected to be done up front as part of the grant of planning permission.

https://www.oracleasbestos.com/blog/contaminated-land/asbestos-in-soil-guide/.

The industry guidance to construction companies about what they need to do on the investigations front is from about para 164 onward

https://www.claire.co.uk/projects-and-initiatives/asbestos-in-soil

There seems to be quite a lot of detail, and as the protection of workers extends well beyond just issuing them with protective equipment (eg controlled wetting, low intensity work methods, possibly ventilation) that would presumably provide appropriate protection for neighbouring properties?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/330070-removed/#findComment-1631871
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Some foxes are very tame. The foxes that live near the electricity sub-station thing on the corner of Calton and Woodwarde will happily walk up to you/passed you. They are some of the best looking foxes around so clearly being well-fed - glorious coats and bushy tails but interested in humans and keen to engage/be fed rather than being scared.
    • Let’s not all get scared of the foxes now. Most likely explanation is protecting its den or association with food. We have foxes, and cats and they are no bother to each other. The fox will leave when the cats are out.   
    • I remember seeing something a few years ago on TV about a fox that was actually biting through people's shopping / takeaway food bags.  It was situated in an alleyway.  Not in London.  Very interesting in how the  urban foxes brain development has  been affected by their surroundings.   Not an exact quote from Darwin.  It's the adaptable that survive / not the strongest or the most intelligent.   I would be worried if a fox came close me.   Because they might be after my fur babies and they carry a lot of nasties.   Although they look beautiful from a distance or on a 🎄 card.  
    • Driving down Lordship lane around 2.45pm today saw a v sick looking fox walking in and out of the crowd. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...