Jump to content

Do you or your daughters have size 9 feet or larger?


Recommended Posts

I've set up www.shoesforruby.co.uk, importing on trend, seasonal and affordable shoes in UK 9, 10 & 11. I blog about setting up a business and shoes, as well as a few other things but I sell these shoes via eBay:


http://stores.ebay.co.uk/shoesforrubyuksizes91011


I'm a new and enthusiastic business owner based in SE15 so message me with any questions and I will be happy to help!


Thanks for reading


Hannah

Twitter.com/shoesforruby

facebook.com/shoesforruby

Hi RosieH


Thanks for your feedback - I would love to market to the trans base, I want my shoes out there! My marketing strategy is in its infancy, do you have any tips as to how to get my message to those prospective customers?


Thanks


Hannah

I'm very glad you like them! But no, these shoes are for those of us who can't walk into a shop and buy off the shelf!


Harsh I know - but that's my mission and I'm sticking to it!


I would suggest somewhere like Office, New Look or Topshop may well do something similar - all my shoes are on trend and in keeping with the current fashion. Hope that helps


x

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Do you have a link to this? The only one i could find was on the 24th July
    • Yes and I heard the other day that there is a higher conviction rate with trials heard by only a judge, vs juries, which makes sense when you think about it.  Also - call me cynical - I can't help but think that this justice reform story was thrown out to overshadow the Reeves / OBR / Budget story.  But I do agree with scrapping juries for fraud cases. 
    • judges are, by definition, a much narrower strata of society. The temptation to "rattle through" numbers, regardless of right, wrong or justice is fundamentally changed If we trust judges that much, why have we ever bothered with juries in the first place? (that's a rhetorical question btw - there is no sane answer which goes along the lines of "good point, judges only FTW"
    • Ah yes, of course, I'd forgotten that the cases will be heard by judges and not Mags. But how does losing juries mean less work for barristers, though? Surely all the other problems (no courtrooms, loos, witnesses etc etc) that stop cases going to trial, or slow trials down - will still exist? Then they'll still be billing the same? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...