Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Did anyone know this was even on the table?

Now the Mayor has passed the baton to councils over this it will be interesting to hear what Southwark says - they did not respond to the BBC when approached but other councils have said they have no plans to implement it - I suspect the Mayor's office is doing a cleanse of anything buried in their plans they think might become a political hot potato ahead of the mayoral election and ahead of the general election.

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-66647266

When I went to the 2015 Mansion House event when Mayor Johnson announced his plans for the ULEZ he spoke about his ambitions for a zero emission zone for the Congestion Charging Zone.  Not heard the current Mayor supporting this.  Would you support this Rocks?

And you've not answered my question on another thread about Mayor Khan's excellent record on electric buses.  Surely you must welcome this.  

Edited by malumbu

Malumbu - doing my best not to feed the trolls! 😉

 

But yes, I have been very supportive of electrification of any road vehicle as it seems to me to be the quickest fix to a problem - but I was shocked to hear how few miles the "electric" black cabs do as pure electric they are hybrid rather than full electric but any reduction has to be considered a step in the right direction.

 

I just wish others felt the same way about helping encourage the transition to electric cars as that does seem like the most sensible near-term solution to transition away from combustion engines.

Edited by Rockets

Interesting though that he hasn't abandoned his plans to use the ULEZ (and all other traffic enforcement and CCTV cameras) to implement Pay per Mile driving charges.

Given the appallingly duplicitous nature of most announcements by Labour on anything to do with privately owned cars I expect he will actually try to implement a zero ICE car policy inside the North / South circular by permitting them but charging people hugely exploitative amounts of money for driving in  that zone.

See Southwark Labour's charging policy for CPZ permits as an example of this sort of snakey behaviour. 

Edited by CPR Dave

Pay per mile is the fairest way of collecting revenue from motorists but HAS to be a national scheme. 

Rocks can you just say "yes Mayor Khan has a great record on reducing emissions from buses including roll out of electric buses.". Much appreciated.

Electric taxis were a nationally supported scheme by the now Office of Zero Emission Vehicles". The high cost and low range  were  issues for full EV at the time of launch.  it was therefore mandated that these had to be zero emission capable (can't remember if there was a minimum range) and government supported the London Black Cab company (can't remember the name) with the hope that this would be rolled out nationally and internationally.

So any complaint should be aimed at government although black cabbies have too much influence in London, are self and over regulated including blanket requirements for turning circles and accessibility - latter should be a certain percentage.  This makes black cabs expensive to buy, with a high cost of the 'plate' and therefore at a disadvantage Vs minicabs and Uber leading to regular taxi wars.

The queues at major ranks and Heathrow often with engines idling (not a problem with EVs) shows that this is not a market working well for consumers but the industry and TfL are not receptive to any liberalisation of the market.

Yes I do know lots about this subject and this post is off the top of my head not from Wiki.

Dunno why I have red text above

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'd reread what you posted and try to summarise.  It just comes across as a rant.
    • Just shows, to me, once proud to be a citizen of UK.. now.. well if we pay/contribute to services - nhs, police, fire etc and folk who have made this there home - no matter what creed or culture.. for the love c of God, can someone  please explain to me.. how we have working royals who like them or not, have tried and continue to actually support and make a change and then we have Andrew.. who just destroys everything.. not just him, or royalty but his own children..  I had great admiration for The Queen - and respect.. as have a huge number of people.. but.. these old traditions where gosh.. live rent free and can’t get chucked out until I believe 2070? From what I scanned..well he has and continues to have it all.. has to go thru what old rules? Etc.  doubt very much he has even kept the upkeep maintenance up on his abode.. and do the shite keeps on pulling up.. What has Andrew done for UK or for that matter since he was 20?? Do please tell me       Totally off topic, before anyone jumps down my throat.. I just do not get how anyone is proud to be British at this point in time. Whoever is in power, seems to be able to help themselves to the public purse with no redress at all - Covid is a great example of lining of pockets.. Millions  given to Rowanda, so one is led to believe, to help with refugee problem and one can’t get a plane load off!  I simply do not get it at all. Use of food banks in UK growing yearly, homeless as well, nhs, police, fire service etc all on their knees..        
    • Have applied the green roof at a number of properties and no issues you are concerned about detected. Have issues with cats defecating in the vicinity, however, they are not selecting the green roof specifically. Use decent compost, slow release fertiliser specific for green roofs, and lay it methodically not leaving blank patches. It looks amazing when cared for and adds value.  
    • Some suggestions for mandatory action might include:- 1. Permit retailers to display facial images on the premises  of previous offenders at their local store. 2. Sound an alert and display images on screens inside the store when the FR flags up a person entering who is on the national database of shoplifters. 3. Physically bar recognised shoplifters from the premises. Should they attempt to force entry then charges should be pressed under aggravated trespass, which  a criminal offence under the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994. 4. Change the law to allow retailers to have enhanced powers of citizens arrest. What would you suggest? The UK seems to have the most lenient policy towards shoplifting , probably because of other demands on the police force. On the plus side, they may have more time for it now that non-crime hate incidents will no longer be investigated. Other countries, such as the USA have much more sever punishment as does Singapore where repeat offenders or aggravated cases can be sentenced to up to 3 years in prison, a fine, or both.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...