Jump to content

Recommended Posts

In general you cannot approach barristers directly, that is done by and through solicitors. Barristers expect a solicitor to prepare their case (brief)  for them, and also expect a solicitor to have taken a preliminary view of the client and their problem to approach a suitable barrister. [And to filter out those clients who may not have a sufficient case to take to law]. In general that approach works best - particular solicitors specialise in particular areas of the law and know the best people for specific issues. And their availability. Barristers (on an hourly rate) are also far more expensive than solicitors.

The English legal system differs from, e.g. the American. They have only come together slightly recently where solicitors can plead cases directly in some courts.

Thanks for all your help now sorted. Barristers can be contacted directly. There’s loads on the Internet. I wanted a direct recommendation from someone who had used a particular barrister for a civil case, preferably local. 
it still seems to me weird that a solicitor, who prepares the entire defence, knows the case inside out, has to step back to allow a barrister to present the case even in a small civil hearing.  

One can indeed now directly instruct a barrister. And there are loads on the internet. 

It is worth, however, double-checking anyone you choose on the Bar Council's Direct Access Portal, just to make sure. 

 

https://www.barcouncil.org.uk/bar-council-services/for-the-public/direct-access-portal.html

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Link to petition if anyone would like to object: Londis Off-License Petition https://chng.it/9X4DwTDRdW
    • He did mention it's share of freehold, I’d be very cautious with that. It can turn into a nightmare if relationships with neighbours break down. My brother had a share of freehold in a flat in West Hampstead, and when he needed to sell, the neighbour refused to sign the transfer of the freehold. What followed was over two years of legal battles, spiralling costs and constant stress. He lost several potential buyers, and the whole sale fell through just as he got a job offer in another city. It was a complete disaster. The neighbour was stubborn and uncooperative, doing everything they could to delay the process. It ended in legal deadlock, and there was very little anyone could do without their cooperation. At that point, the TA6 form becomes the least of your worries; it’s the TR1 form that matters. Without the other freeholder’s signature on that, you’re stuck. After seeing what my brother went through, I’d never touch a share of freehold again. When things go wrong, they can go really wrong. If you have a share of freehold, you need a respectful and reasonable relationship with the others involved; otherwise, it can be costly, stressful and exhausting. Sounds like these neighbours can’t be reasoned with. There’s really no coming back from something like this unless they genuinely apologise and replace the trees and plants they ruined. One small consolation is that people who behave like this are usually miserable behind closed doors. If they were truly happy, they’d just get on with their lives instead of trying to make other people’s lives difficult. And the irony is, they’re being incredibly short-sighted. This kind of behaviour almost always backfires.  
    • I had some time with him recently at the local neighbourhood forum and actually was pretty impressed by him, I think he's come a long way.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...