Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Tim.Gurner, Australian tycoon calls for  layoffs to fix workers attitude.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-66803279

An interesting article which has gathered a lot of criticism towards Tim Gurner. 

His argument, in a nutshell, is that workers demand too much from employers and expect a company to bend over backwards for them. This, according to Tim, has been made worse following covid.

He believes higher unemployment rates will make workers keen to work for a company and less likely to demand more lenient working practices.

Looking from a worker point, I can see the anger this will cause, but understanding business I can also see the frustration employers face.

At the end of the day, a business is there to either make something, sell something or provide a service. The more demands a worker puts on the business, the higher the potential cost is to do business and the higher the end price to a consumer will be  

Are we starting to replicate similar issues faced in the 70s (British Leyland for example) where workers demands caused poor productivity and poor delivery? 

Without removing protection for Workers, is Tim Gurner right, wrong and do we need an adjustment between business and workers to rebalance expectations from both sides? 

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/332943-are-workers-over-privileged/
Share on other sites

Man who benefits from market forces doesn't like it when market forces affect him. 
 

He's a landlord, he doesnt make, or produce anything. He buys things using credit (unavailable to others) and then restricts supply to increase profit. 

Am i right to assume that your post was a polemic, otherwise you're almost both siding an argument for feudalism.

  • Like 1

How would he have become a 'tycoon' without workers? At the end of the day, a business is there to make a profit. Mostly for the owners of the business. There's nothing stopping either party parting company if they so choose. Perhaps there should be a recognition that they need each other......

Rather a sweeping statement on underprivileged workers.  Comparisons with the 1970s pander to the GB news crowd, it's like comparing a small punch up at a lower division football match with 1000s scrapping at Man U away matches in 1975.  A different world and a different scale.

Working life in Australia is also very different in the 1970s they called striking the "English disease" where days lost through industrial action down under per worker were higher down under.

For many sectors we need stronger worker protection, and better pay and conditions - hospitality, catering and care being great examples.  Hands up who orders food to be delivered by someone on zero hours contracts.  Rather than government saying over 50s should become delivery riders, better if they said that Deliveroo should make their riders PAYE, give them training, ensure they use lights and night and don't ride illegal bikes (better still provide them).

  • Like 2
  • 3 weeks later...

Greater exploitation doesn't increase productivity (quite the opposite), but is can increase profit. He wants higher unemployment so that he can exploit desperate people for his own enrichment. He sounds like a typical Tory.

Edited by Earl Aelfheah
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Oh, deffo a reason not to attend (Bud). Two of my tournaments have been in Germany where they insist on having the local brew as well.  In Brazil it was Bud, but enterprising shacks on the way were selling Brazilian beer, although Brahma is just as bad.  You need German communities to have decent stuff.    
    • You may come into the catchment area of Fair Lawn primary in Honor Oak,  Secondary would possibly be Sydenham Girls in Dartmouth Road   or one of the private schools
    • As an avid reader and user of Dulwich Library it is a facility I could not live without. Listening to friends/family who live outside London where library hours are reduced, book loans limited and fines exorbitant, we are very fortunate. However, if push came to shove I would be more than willing to pay a yearly subscription of up to £50 pa to retain this valuable asset should there be an attempt  to close the library due to funding restraints. I am a pensioner but could afford that yearly amount - when you think that even buying a paperback would cost you £8 - £10. Have purchased a number of books from charity shops and have a pile of them on my bedroom floor to return  to them. Many years ago we donated brand new books in Polish which my father in law ordered before his death. Dulwich Library reluctantly took them when we informed that there was a large Polish community in the area. Although husband speaks Polish his reading of the language is quite poor. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...