Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello all, 

Just wondering if anyone could point me in the right direction. 

Regarding leak from upstairs, not sure who to contact when neighbour being totally inconsiderate. 

I thought I would write to leaseholders, however not sure of address. 

I have been told the building insurance would cover southwark to see if they can do any work to my lights and ceiling, however I've been told I would have to claim and I would have to pay the £500 excess, which is pretty unfair for me to have to pay! 

Would be nice to have considerate neighbours as It stands at moment, 3 days after leak, they called plumber, regardless my property being flooded and through my ceiling lights. 

The supply to the part it leaked from was turned off and the leak hasn't been fixed, which is causing me to not be able to use my lights plus pointless me calling electrician to check my lights, as when the plumber visits again, he told me he has to use a hearing device to find leak as pipes in concrete floor, and to allow him to do this the supply will have to be turned on again, which means for whatever lenght of time it takes to find where leak is, my ceiling will be flooded again. Thanks in advance 

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/333341-leaseholder-advice/
Share on other sites

If the leak comes from pipework in an upstairs property (and not, for instance from a hole in the roof!) then the liability is with the 'owner' of the upstairs property and their insurer - either the landlord if it's a tenant, or the leaseholder if it's a leasehold property. You should find out who is the insurer for the relevant property and contact them. Repairing your damage should be their responsibility. If you are a leaseholder you could also contact your own buildings insurer who will follow up with the insurer of the property above you.

There's always a complication when there are separate properties within a building and leaseholders, as there can be two buildings insurances, one for the 'exterior' of the property (roof, walls etc.) and one (or more) for the interiors of the apartments.

But if it's not your leak, you shouldn't have to be paying!

  • Thanks 1

Thanks for your reply, we are both leaseholders and the freeholder is southwark council. The council say its the responsibility of the leaseholder, they don't get involved. The building insurance covers external issues, and they told me I would have to claim and all they would do is make my electrics safe, ie turn off from fuse box, however all my lights are on same circuit board for half my flat, which would leave me in the dark! Plus they said even if it is a leak from leaseholder upstairs, I would have to pay £500 excess, not the neighbour. I may just have to call a solicitor for advice. Her dad told me Sunday they are not calling a plumber as he doesn't believe it is from their flat, and told me to shut up. So after living here 42 years I now have a neighbour who basically doesn't care whether my property is getting damaged. I had to say to the dad that he is making the situation worse and the longer the leak is left the more damage and I will have to take it to court. Considering it's my property getting damaged since 16th and plumber called 18th, it should have been me getting angry. Anyhow I think the only way to get advice is thru a solicitor as this is the, second leak since April and her stopcock in garden doesn't work so if this happens again I will be in same situation except I am getting my bathroom refurbished and will be worse if I get a leak from upstairs again. 

  • Sad 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...