Jump to content

Recommended Posts

PETITION


Save Our Community Businesses


We the undersigned strongly believe that Lewisham Council should reconsider its position regarding Discretionary Rates Relief in respect of Community Groups and Community Interest Companies.

We are particularly concerned regarding the current level of rates that are demanded from our community assets and which make them unsustainable. We are particularly aggrieved with the current situation regarding the new community based business, Doopo Doopo, located at 15 Dartmouth Road, SE233HN.

We believe that assets within the Borough that are social businesses and clearly supporting the local community should receive discretionary relief on the same basis as neighbouring boroughs and trust that you will reconsider this decision and re-evaluate the current charges.

This petition is supported by:

FOREST HILL SOCIETY

And

SHOP REVOLUTION:

delivering POP-UP SHOPS for SEE3


You can help us by signing the petition in the Gallery:

15 Dartmouth Road, SE23


Or on the website:

doopodoopo.co.uk


Thank you so much for your support, it is utterly important for us.


The petition will presented by our local Councillor Alex Feaks in front of the Mayer on the 26th of June.

I don't want to rain on anyone's parade but essentially you're asking other businesses and Council Tax payers to subsidise your Community Group and Community Interest Companies.


This may be entirely appropriate and a GOOD THING - providing the Community Interest Companies aren't using the subsidy to compete with mainstream ordinary businesses such as a greengrocer, stationers, art supplies shop, restaurants and so on

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi!  I was wondering whether anyone had a birth pool that they are looking to sell? Thanks! Sarah
    • @Rumbero Just as I had suspected. The meter is outside under the pavement with an easy access metal cover and so I shall be taking regular readings from now on for about the next 60 days. Then I will have an accurate measure of consumption. There is a device immediately under the cover connected to the meter which guess sends the data to TW.
    • Yes - the fact they go long on how awful the other adult was but seem a bit reluctant to talk about their own behaviour! If you actually read the OP, their argument with the man wasn't about the kid hitting him, but about OP being told that their "reaction was over the top". Well, OK, then, OP - what was that reaction? OP then says "As I walked away, I heard him and two other adults talking and laughing about my reaction – yes, laughing." That's an interesting detail. Many possibilities here. Is the world is so chock full of sadists that even casual onlookers cackle at the sight of someone being smacked into by a 4 year old on a bike? Did OP make a bit of a tit of themselves with their reaction? Or something else entirely? We'll never really know because we don't have both sides of the story - in fact, not even a complete one-sided story...
    • Do you have any reason, other than malice, to doubt the OP's two posts setting out what happened?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...