Jump to content

Recommended Posts

 

2 hours ago, Peckhampam said:

is it an NHS letter?  Apparently the new computer system at Kings and Guys is generating letters to people who lived at addresses up to 30 years ago.

Yes it is. That would explain it, thank you.

This new system seems to be experiencing rather a lot of what could most kindly be called "teething problems" 🙄

Edited by Sue
2 hours ago, Sue said:

 

Yes it is. That would explain it, thank you.

This new system seems to be experiencing rather a lot of what could most kindly be called "teething problems" 🙄

I keep getting repeated emails about the same test results sent to me. This includes saying the tests were carried out at Guys and St Thomas’ when they weren’t.   Sending letters to the wrong address seems like a big GDPR fail.

4 hours ago, alice said:

I wonder how easily it would be possible to find all previous occupants of a particular address. I had an aunt Winnie she would have  been 115. 

Yes, I've had a PM which confirms that this Winifred  previously lived (decades ago!) at the house to which the letter was delivered. 

My best friend at school was called Winifred. So was my Latin teacher 🤣

2 hours ago, Froglander said:

I keep getting repeated emails about the same test results sent to me. This includes saying the tests were carried out at Guys and St Thomas’ when they weren’t.   Sending letters to the wrong address seems like a big GDPR fail.

I missed a physio appointment because it was on the new system as a video appointment, when it was actually face to face.

I had phoned that morning to confirm it was video, because I thought it was strange, as I hadn't been told this when I booked it. I was assured that yes it was. 

Both the physio and I completely wasted our time - him waiting in a room for me to turn up, me being told online when on the video link that my appointment was delayed - I gave up waiting after twenty minutes "delay" 😡

Then when I phoned to find out what was going on, the physio reception had closed 

The physio phoned me the next day to apologise and make a new appointment, but it clearly wasn't his fault.

Edited by Sue
Clarification

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • That's a great solution, but not really practical for a second floor windowsill! I tried many things, spiky wires sticking out to deter them from landing, the widest cage available (pictured), but they would still descend, scaring off all the small songbirds, cram their heads through the cage and devour all the food. I was metaphorically tearing my hair out so, combined with the worries about spreading disease, I had to call it a day. Very sad.
    • Plus it is pure hypocrisy from the council, who pontificate about cleaner, greener, spaces, but then throw that out of the window for a bit of cash from a disruptive event.  I will raise this with them. I will point out to them that whether their event takes place or not is of as little consequence too 😉 Because they are public servants paid for by our taxes. It's the whole reason FOI exists. We have a right to know certain things.
    • Have you used them yourself for secondary glazing to a bay window?
    • Hi try Direct Glass in Penge 0208 778 6437 ,very Reasonable 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...