Jump to content

Recommended Posts

 

2 hours ago, Peckhampam said:

is it an NHS letter?  Apparently the new computer system at Kings and Guys is generating letters to people who lived at addresses up to 30 years ago.

Yes it is. That would explain it, thank you.

This new system seems to be experiencing rather a lot of what could most kindly be called "teething problems" 🙄

Edited by Sue
2 hours ago, Sue said:

 

Yes it is. That would explain it, thank you.

This new system seems to be experiencing rather a lot of what could most kindly be called "teething problems" 🙄

I keep getting repeated emails about the same test results sent to me. This includes saying the tests were carried out at Guys and St Thomas’ when they weren’t.   Sending letters to the wrong address seems like a big GDPR fail.

4 hours ago, alice said:

I wonder how easily it would be possible to find all previous occupants of a particular address. I had an aunt Winnie she would have  been 115. 

Yes, I've had a PM which confirms that this Winifred  previously lived (decades ago!) at the house to which the letter was delivered. 

My best friend at school was called Winifred. So was my Latin teacher 🤣

2 hours ago, Froglander said:

I keep getting repeated emails about the same test results sent to me. This includes saying the tests were carried out at Guys and St Thomas’ when they weren’t.   Sending letters to the wrong address seems like a big GDPR fail.

I missed a physio appointment because it was on the new system as a video appointment, when it was actually face to face.

I had phoned that morning to confirm it was video, because I thought it was strange, as I hadn't been told this when I booked it. I was assured that yes it was. 

Both the physio and I completely wasted our time - him waiting in a room for me to turn up, me being told online when on the video link that my appointment was delayed - I gave up waiting after twenty minutes "delay" 😡

Then when I phoned to find out what was going on, the physio reception had closed 

The physio phoned me the next day to apologise and make a new appointment, but it clearly wasn't his fault.

Edited by Sue
Clarification

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • well they are all very nice and definitely helpful to me. 
    • Can't agree with this, some of them appear totally gormless and can't even look you in the eye or say a word when asked a straightforward question about the membership card at the till. The only cheerful person in there is Tom and he'll proactively talk to anyone about anything. That guy deserves more.
    • The person behind the till won't know about whether or not an assignment of their lease has been purchased by a company like Tesco.  Poundland was sold for a nominal fee so it's unsurprising that the location may close soon. As well, for what it's worth, someone working in the shop is likely to have their job impacted by the shop closing, so having loads of people going and asking them about the potential closing of their shop isn't really nice. "Hey, hear you'll be out of a job soon. Know much about that?" The best resource you all should be using for queries about planning details of new shops is the council's website. As was stated on the first page of this post, there's an application lodged for multiple changes at 29-35 Lordship Lane with the client as Tesco. They wouldn't lodge these plans unless it was happening, or at least extremely likely to happen.    The application is on the council's website here: https://planning.southwark.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?keyVal=SVW246KBKF500&activeTab=summary 
    • It's a notice about a licence, but the only name on it is Poundland.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...