Jump to content

Healing Offered (Reiki)


Recommended Posts

My name is Kevin and I am a qualified Reiki II Practitioner in Usui Reiki/ Usui Reiki plus Seichem and Shamanic


I live in south London (Dulwich) and I am offering treatments in Lambeth, Wandsworth , Southwark and Dulwich for Usui Reiki and Siechem and Usui Shiki Ryoho .. I also work Shamanically providing a Mind, body and spirit experience.


Reiki is the name given to a system of natural healing which evolved in Japan from the experience and dedication of Dr Mikao Usui



The method of receiving a Reiki treatment from a practitioner is a very simple process. The recipient simply lies on a couch and relaxes. If they are unable to lie down the treatment can be given in a sitting position.There is no need to remove any clothing as Reiki will pass through anything. The practitioner gently places their hands non-intrusively in a sequence of positions which cover the whole body. The whole person is treated. A full treatment usually takes 1 hour with each position held for several minutes.


I can come to you, treatments can be in the comfort of your home or outside in the park/woods. Its your healing you decide.


A reiki treatment is ?30 for a one hour session


check out my website for other treatments and prices. information about me , and where I have trained.


My website address is www.3dropsofinspiration.co.uk



I am a member of:


The Reiki and Seichem Association

The Distant Healing Network

Order of the Bards Ovates and Druids

Anderida Gorsedd

Egerton Reiki

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/33527-healing-offered-reiki/
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Looking for around half a dozen concrete pavers ( the tinner ones) should measure 44c44cmx by 32mm thick
    • I would imagine that the evidence shows that protein powder is not suitable for under 18s whatever the brand.  Staff should’ve known that.
    • I'm not sure it's sensible  to presume any agreement from interlocutors, but if you do, then I do agree that it's the right thing to say so. My own guess -- it's nothing more -- is that the officers were acting just to effect an arrest on arrival, as requested, quite possibly without any knowledge of the content of wretched tweet at all*, and that their being armed was absolutely incidental.  But I don't know any reliable facts. I do think the turning up (5?) en masse to do so was possibly complacent and unthinking, if there was no reason to believe the arrestee was a threat.  If they had  been doing so for good reason, I guess they could have had at least one weapon trained at him, and had  him hands above head or on the ground in no time.  But I know no reliable facts of the incident whatsoever.  Perhaps they were Father Ted fans -- seriously -- and trogged along, on a quiet afternoon, to see the man himself.  Perhaps they and/or their CO will get a severe bollocking from above.  I don't know. * But even that with some reservations.  The last time I looked up cases on wrongful arrest, years ago, I think I remember there being held then to be at least some onus on the acting arresting officer to be satisfied that  the required grounds for a lawful arrest  did exist.  And I don't know any of the facts of the present case. 
    • They carry guns at the airport.  It may not make it ok but that is a fact.  In France and America they all carry guns.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...