Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Surely it’s not just me that finds the constant lack of a reliable train service at a weekend frustrating? Southern seem to use any excuse to axe weekend services despite the demand which puts more pressure on the roads through buses and cars. 

Wondered if in the past any particular forms of lobbying - petitions, councillors etc - have worked to exact change or is it a lost cause? 🙏🏻

  • Like 1
On 02/12/2023 at 07:01, JRDulwich said:

Surely it’s not just me that finds the constant lack of a reliable train service at a weekend frustrating? Southern seem to use any excuse to axe weekend services despite the demand which puts more pressure on the roads through buses and cars. 

Wondered if in the past any particular forms of lobbying - petitions, councillors etc - have worked to exact change or is it a lost cause? 🙏🏻

It is absolutely ridiculous, I agree.

  • 11 months later...

Even when the trains are supposed to be running  ..........  yesterday Sunday 10th Nov, two consecutive London Bridge trains were cancelled - 18:44 and 19:14.  Twice an hour is barely a service anyway, but then having to wait more than an hour! What are we supposed to do? Going out into central London has become less appealing over the past couple of years because of unreliable transport across London.

  • Agree 1

Moves against privately owned cars only work when public transport is available and dependable. And relatively frequent. Often at weekends trains effectively disappear for planned works, or for unplanned reasons as now. And buses offer tortuous and long east west travel for us (trains offer effectively none). I use public transport whenever I can, which seems increasingly infrequently! It's either not there or not going my way. 

I had a great bus and tube journey to and from central London on Saturday night.  Trains weren't running, but my connections were brilliant.  Friday to North Greenwich was also successful.

Conversely my bus journey to Sydenham yesterday was disrupted by road works and the fatal shooting.

London public transport is brilliant and no need to use a car for the majority of my journeys.

I did raise frequent engineering work on the Overground and a reduction in post COVID mainline with Ellie and feel she needs to make this a higher priority.

28 minutes ago, Forest Hill Climber said:

It's brilliant that that you had a brilliant experience and that TFL is brilliant. If it's all so brilliant, why did you need to write to our brilliant MP?  Has she agreed to do anything about anything?

If you read Malumbu's post properly, you will find out why he wrote to Ellie.

Oh, ooops, I mean Ellie Reeves. Just in case it wasn't clear who I meant 🙄

Edited by Sue
10 minutes ago, Moovart said:

  I think it undermines the importance of a role when we call our elected representatives by their first name only so I'm all for full names.

In which case she is actually The Lady Cryer, married to John, Baron Cryer. She chooses to use her maiden name for electoral purposes. 

The rail service is particularly poor and the weekend traveller seems to take the brunt of it. Whenever we are making plans for any given weekend we always check ahead for fear of the dreaded "Bus Replacement Service" and the frequency of trains not being available has increased markedly at weekends over the last few years.

1 hour ago, Forest Hill Climber said:

It's brilliant that that you had a brilliant experience and that TFL is brilliant. If it's all so brilliant, why did you need to write to our brilliant MP?  Has she agreed to do anything about anything?

bgf8f8f8-flat750x075f-pad750x1000f8f8f8.thumb.jpg.b335adf035e6b60247b262e9c6682cca.jpg

43 minutes ago, Insuflo said:

Pure ignorance on your part. She uses her given name. There is no requirement, legal or otherwise, for a woman to change her name on marriage. She is not an adjunct to John Cryer.

Personally, I think describing herself as Ellie is misleading.  

3 hours ago, Insuflo said:

She is not an adjunct to John Cryer.

She chooses not to use that name professionally, which is her right, but as the wife of a Baron the style I quoted is legally hers, even though she may not have made a legal change to her name on marriage. This is different from a wife choosing not to use her husband's name. Her legal style is The Lady Cryer, even though she doesn't choose to use it professionally. 

Edited by Penguin68

Should political representation be concentrated in families? Ellie and John are both MP's as is Ellie's sister Rachel. Both of John's parents were MP's.  Very cosy.

 

I Imagine Ellie couldn't care less about public transport as she uses the car park at work. I have previously written to Ellie but there was zero response.

Edited by Forest Hill Climber
Mixed up John with his dad Bob
49 minutes ago, Forest Hill Climber said:

Should political representation be concentrated in families? Ellie and John are both MP's as is Ellie's sister Rachel. Both of John's parents were MP's.  Very cosy.

 

I Imagine Ellie couldn't care less about public transport as she uses the car park at work. I have previously written to Ellie but there was zero response.

I got responses, just not very good.  I could have written a better one myself.  No doubt her team replied.  She has a good record of dealing with difficult family issues I'm reliably informed.

4 hours ago, Moovart said:

Can we call our MP by her full name Ellie Reeves even if she is our bezzy mate behind the scenes?  I think it undermines the importance of a role when we call our elected representatives by their first name only so I'm all for full names.

I go out my way to call elected representatives by formal names.  Mayor Khan and former Mayor and former PM Johnson.  Off this site I just called them by their surnames.  I detest the whole move to first names for politicians.  It started with Johnson, whose first name I won't use.  He is not my mate, he is not cuddly and funny.  He is a self serving  liar who was happy to screw the country up for political gain.  I asked the Beeb to not use his first name but they fobbed me off.

I use Ellie here for effect, to make out we are on close terms, which we aren't.  And for effect, ie complain through official channels before posting on social media.

I go threatened by my MP once, a long time ago, that anecdote is for the pub

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • There's probably a bigger discussion on why we celebrate Christmas (pagan/religious festival) and why everything has to shut down.  I've enjoyed Xmas days in Spain, Mexico and France where some businesses and restaurants are open, and in a number of non-Christrian countries.  In both sets of occasions it has been festive, but not over the top and the Spanish seem to have a more relaxed attitude in a country where the church is probably more important than the UK.  A Lounge conversation.  I'll no doubt be popping into the Forest Hill Road supermarket on Xmas day for things we have forgotten, with many others in a similar situation who grew up in the Christian faith (I've long since been an atheist).   
    • Would anyone have ends of balls of wool, any colour, to mend an old blanket? Any colour? With thanks Mila
    • I’m not a Gail’s fan but there’s no reason a business shouldn’t open on Christmas Day. However, nobody should be compelled to work the day which, given the widespread coverage of Gail’s questionable employment practices, has to be a possibility here.  The only business I ever use on the 25th is maybe a pub and that’s a rarity these days but buses running would be very welcome for visiting etc. But the swings in the park should definitely remain chained up. Are parks even open on Christmas Day?
    • To be honest, pal, it's not good being a fan of a local business and then not go there. One on hand, the barber shop literally next door to Romeo Jones started serving coffee. The Crown and Greyhound and Rocca serve coffee. Redemption Coffee opened up not far away, and then also Megan's next door to that. DVillage was serving coffee (but wasn't very popular), as was Au Ciel (which is). Maybe also Heritage Cheese, I don't know. There's also Flotsam and Jetsam doing coffee and sandwiches at Dulwich Picture Gallery in the other direction. The whole of Dulwich Village serves coffee. And yet on the other hand, there are enough punters to support all good coffee shops. With the exception of Rocca and Megan's (which are both big spaces) and C&G (which does coffee like everything else - slow and with bad service), all these places regularly get queues out the door. Gail's often has big queues and yet very few people crossed the street to Romeo Jones (which was much better)... Half the staff at Gail's are perfectly fine and efficient. The other half are pretty offhand and rude. It's certainly not welcoming or friendly service. But they're certainly hard working, and no doubt raking the money in for Luke Johnson...
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...