Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi all!

I'm new to the forum and am really interested in buying a flat in Petworth house within the dog kennel hill estate. The flat would be ex local authority. The building looks fantastic and you get a lot of space within the flats. Since I'd be a first time buyer I was hoping to get some advice / thoughts from people on here.

I would be a leaseholder and a large concern of mine would be for any major works planned, as I've heard the bills can be huge. Does anyone who owns a flat within the dog kennel hill estate have information on how much they roughly pay for major works on average each year? And also if anyone is aware of any planned for the upcoming months/years? I hear there are surveys for the building safety act coming up?

I also had a question about renovations. I've heard that changes to the property have to be put forward to the council before doing them. Does this also concern cosmetic things? I.e. putting up shelves, changing carpets etc? It seems a bit crazy asking for permission for these things after paying for a property.

Thanks in advance for the help! I really appreciate it. All going well, hopefully see you soon!

Cheers! 

From what I have heard from other leaseholders in Southwark  bills  from £5000  to £30.000  depending on type of work. My old neighbour was in a conversion flat and paid £5000 for exterior painting including scaffolding costs and within 3 months most of the paint has worn off.

The bills are indeed often horrific. Can't help feeling that the books are highly cooked against the leaseholders' favour, meaning bills of 10,000s that the leaseholders have to pay. You'd be paying way above what's normal market value for the works whether they be new windows, utilities, upkeep of  communal areas, roofs and guttering, green space, carparks etc. The problem is you can't just pay for your eg. own new windows (which is typical for most leaseholders in purpose built developments) but do have to pay up for the figure on which Southwark agree with a contractor. (IMO tendering will likely involve bidding contractors each quoting very high sums, so difficult for you to argue against it.) On the plus side you're likely to be able to pay for works in instalments and pass on such dues to the next owner when you sell if you've not finished paying.

If you love the flat then get on and buy it, but take detailed written and verbal advice from your solicitor during the transaction. It's a good place to live, so good luck! 👍🏻 

Please do your research about leaseholder restrictions and responsibilities. I would not recommend any purchase of flat in a LA owned building. It’s cheaper than in any equivalent privately owned block for a very, very good reason.

Walk away - please find somewhere else.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...