Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Yesterday the lovely Lordship Lane pavements were covered in puddles of water every few yards! Why? 
What are MPs, local councillors, especially those responsible for pavement maintenance budgets, shopkeepers and residents doing to campaign for annd ensure  upgrades of the dangerous pavements??

I an a regular visitor to family in the area. Pavements are still dangerous when it is not raining, but worse when raining. But why are the lawyers in the various councils responsible not insisting  works are carried out to avoid legal claims from pavement users? 
Why are MPs and Chief executives of the various councils not taking executive action? 
Why are the local newspapers not highlighting the terrible state of the pavements. Why are the local resident associations not taking action? 
WHY?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/338194-ed-pavements/
Share on other sites

The answer to your first question is because it had been raining hard.

I live a minute from Lordship Lane-walk down it most days and have never noticed a problem with the pavements.  However the shop keepers you mention are certainly cutting down safe walking space in various ways and bicyclists on the pavement are a hazard.

2 hours ago, RegularVisitor said:

Yesterday the lovely Lordship Lane pavements were covered in puddles of water every few yards! Why? 
What are MPs, local councillors, especially those responsible for pavement maintenance budgets, shopkeepers and residents doing to campaign for annd ensure  upgrades of the dangerous pavements??

I an a regular visitor to family in the area. Pavements are still dangerous when it is not raining, but worse when raining. But why are the lawyers in the various councils responsible not insisting  works are carried out to avoid legal claims from pavement users? 
Why are MPs and Chief executives of the various councils not taking executive action? 
Why are the local newspapers not highlighting the terrible state of the pavements. Why are the local resident associations not taking action? 
WHY?

The roots of the London Plane trees are causing issues in Lordship Lane as they grow bigger and bigger.  Lovely trees when in the right place but these trees are young and still have a lot of growing today. It was a bad choice of tree for position along the shopping part of lordship lane when Southwark decided to plant them.

It is extremely difficult to get Southwark to maintain these trees eg prune them to a reasonable size on a regular basis so the branches don't tap on flats' windows and rooves; remove them when they cause structural problems such as growing through and damaging an external water pipe (yes that happened) and causing subsidence and sinking of areas of pavements.

I would love to see a proper schedule of maintenance carried out on the plane trees and of the the sinking and uplifting pavements around them but I'm not holding my breath.

The London planes still have a lot of growing to do so I foresee more issues for pavements, shops and flats in the coming years.

6 hours ago, RegularVisitor said:

Yesterday the lovely Lordship Lane pavements were covered in puddles of water every few yards! Why? 
What are MPs, local councillors, especially those responsible for pavement maintenance budgets, shopkeepers and residents doing to campaign for annd ensure  upgrades of the dangerous pavements??

I an a regular visitor to family in the area. Pavements are still dangerous when it is not raining, but worse when raining. But why are the lawyers in the various councils responsible not insisting  works are carried out to avoid legal claims from pavement users? 
Why are MPs and Chief executives of the various councils not taking executive action? 
Why are the local newspapers not highlighting the terrible state of the pavements. Why are the local resident associations not taking action? 
WHY?

Good points

 

 Why not write or talk to the people you mention and see whether you can help make things better? (WHY?) 

From memory the pavement in from of the shops and restaurants on the east side of LL is actually owned by the leaseholders and Southwark are not responsible for it. Or not for the majority of it. Thus coordination of any repair etc is very hard. 
 

The pavement is very  uneven and puddles have been a problem for years when it rains. I’ve been here 15 years. And it was always an issue.

 

the leaves - they used to get swept up but there’s no money for that now. Personally I’d rather see them spend money on maintaining and cleaning the pavements instead of traffic consultations. I once suggested - when they were canvassing for ideas - that the cleaner greener safer fund could be directed towards keeping the pavements clear and safe but it was carefully explained to me that that isn’t what the fund is for!!!

 

write to whoever you like. Good luck. And I mean that!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have sympathy with any voter, anyone, who having witnessed the last 14 years and then Labour in the last year and wonders just how can things be this bad  unless a) they voted for brexit b) voted Tory after 2010 c) is thinking of voting reform  because anyone who thinks reform won’t make things a thousand times worse after voting for the previous?  It is they who are the problem.  They are the reason the country is in the doldrums with an embarrassingly-timid Labour government  Specifically Chris mason - a not very bright right leaning stooge - large part of why bbc news has become grok-level slop  
    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...