Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Yesterday the lovely Lordship Lane pavements were covered in puddles of water every few yards! Why? 
What are MPs, local councillors, especially those responsible for pavement maintenance budgets, shopkeepers and residents doing to campaign for annd ensure  upgrades of the dangerous pavements??

I an a regular visitor to family in the area. Pavements are still dangerous when it is not raining, but worse when raining. But why are the lawyers in the various councils responsible not insisting  works are carried out to avoid legal claims from pavement users? 
Why are MPs and Chief executives of the various councils not taking executive action? 
Why are the local newspapers not highlighting the terrible state of the pavements. Why are the local resident associations not taking action? 
WHY?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/338194-ed-pavements/
Share on other sites

The answer to your first question is because it had been raining hard.

I live a minute from Lordship Lane-walk down it most days and have never noticed a problem with the pavements.  However the shop keepers you mention are certainly cutting down safe walking space in various ways and bicyclists on the pavement are a hazard.

2 hours ago, RegularVisitor said:

Yesterday the lovely Lordship Lane pavements were covered in puddles of water every few yards! Why? 
What are MPs, local councillors, especially those responsible for pavement maintenance budgets, shopkeepers and residents doing to campaign for annd ensure  upgrades of the dangerous pavements??

I an a regular visitor to family in the area. Pavements are still dangerous when it is not raining, but worse when raining. But why are the lawyers in the various councils responsible not insisting  works are carried out to avoid legal claims from pavement users? 
Why are MPs and Chief executives of the various councils not taking executive action? 
Why are the local newspapers not highlighting the terrible state of the pavements. Why are the local resident associations not taking action? 
WHY?

The roots of the London Plane trees are causing issues in Lordship Lane as they grow bigger and bigger.  Lovely trees when in the right place but these trees are young and still have a lot of growing today. It was a bad choice of tree for position along the shopping part of lordship lane when Southwark decided to plant them.

It is extremely difficult to get Southwark to maintain these trees eg prune them to a reasonable size on a regular basis so the branches don't tap on flats' windows and rooves; remove them when they cause structural problems such as growing through and damaging an external water pipe (yes that happened) and causing subsidence and sinking of areas of pavements.

I would love to see a proper schedule of maintenance carried out on the plane trees and of the the sinking and uplifting pavements around them but I'm not holding my breath.

The London planes still have a lot of growing to do so I foresee more issues for pavements, shops and flats in the coming years.

6 hours ago, RegularVisitor said:

Yesterday the lovely Lordship Lane pavements were covered in puddles of water every few yards! Why? 
What are MPs, local councillors, especially those responsible for pavement maintenance budgets, shopkeepers and residents doing to campaign for annd ensure  upgrades of the dangerous pavements??

I an a regular visitor to family in the area. Pavements are still dangerous when it is not raining, but worse when raining. But why are the lawyers in the various councils responsible not insisting  works are carried out to avoid legal claims from pavement users? 
Why are MPs and Chief executives of the various councils not taking executive action? 
Why are the local newspapers not highlighting the terrible state of the pavements. Why are the local resident associations not taking action? 
WHY?

Good points

 

 Why not write or talk to the people you mention and see whether you can help make things better? (WHY?) 

From memory the pavement in from of the shops and restaurants on the east side of LL is actually owned by the leaseholders and Southwark are not responsible for it. Or not for the majority of it. Thus coordination of any repair etc is very hard. 
 

The pavement is very  uneven and puddles have been a problem for years when it rains. I’ve been here 15 years. And it was always an issue.

 

the leaves - they used to get swept up but there’s no money for that now. Personally I’d rather see them spend money on maintaining and cleaning the pavements instead of traffic consultations. I once suggested - when they were canvassing for ideas - that the cleaner greener safer fund could be directed towards keeping the pavements clear and safe but it was carefully explained to me that that isn’t what the fund is for!!!

 

write to whoever you like. Good luck. And I mean that!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
    • I'd quit this thread, let those who just want to slag Labour off have their own thread.  Your views on the economy are worth debating.  I'm just stunned how there wasn't this level of noise with the last government.  I could try to get some dirt on Badenoch but she is pointless  Whilst I am not a fan of the Daily Mirror at least there is some respite from Labour bashing. https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/grenfell-hillsborough-families-make-powerful-36175862 https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/nigel-farage-facing-parliamentary-investigation-36188612  
    • That is a bit cake and eat it tho, isn’t it?    At what point do we stop respecting other people’s opinions and beliefs  because history shows us we sometimes simply have no other choice  you are holding some comfort blanket that allows you to believe we are all equal and all valid and we can simply voice different options - without that ever  impacting on the real world  Were the racists we fought in previous generations different? Were their beliefs patronised by the elites of the time? Or do we learn lessons and avoid mistakes of the past?   racists/bigots having “just as much to say” is both true and yet, a thing we have learnt from the past. The lesson was not “ooh let’s hear them out. They sound interesting and valid and as worthy of an audience as people who hold the opposite opinion” 
    • I don't have a beef with you. But I do have a beef with people who feel that a certain portion of the public's opinion isn't valid.  I don't like racism any more than anyone else here. But I do dislike the idea that an individual's thoughts, beliefs and feelings, no matter how much I may disagree with them, are somehow worth less than my own.  And I get the sense that that is what many disenfranchised voters are feeling - that they are being looked down upon as ignorant, racists who have no right to be in the conversation. And that's what brings out people on the margins and drives them towards extremes, like Reform.  Whether you like it or not, the racist, bigot, anti-european nextdoor to you has just as much say in the country as you do. Intellectual superiority is never going to bring them round. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...