Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi all, my son is taught Mandarin in his Southwark primary school- I thought this an odd choice as they don't offer any European languages- so did some digging- turns out his school, and many others in London and the UK- are partnered with the Confucius Institute- which it turns out, after a little more digging- is run by the Chinese state- and CI employees are contractually bound to promote CCP values and report on Chinese nationals abroad for any non adherence to these values- all in our primary and secondary schools- and universities. UK Governement are defunding the Confucius Institutes for these reasons- as they are part of the 'soft power' initiative of the Chinese State to spread influence and control abroad- but our schools are complicit in careless partnering with organisations that are run by a tryrannical regime- a terrible failure in safeguarding and due diligence. I have contacted my son's school on this but have until now been brushed off. There are resources online that have evidence of this and many articles, a few by The Guardian for example- and the best data is on UK ChinaTransparency but don't know forum policy on posting links so haven't included. If anyone is concerned please do some research, reach out to the school, and DM me if you want links etc. or want to get together to pressure our schools. I for one don't feel comfortable at all having CCP employees teaching my child. Any Chinese nationals who may or may not be considered dissedent or similar, with kids living in the UK, should be very alarmed by this too.

  • 2 weeks later...

Thanks Rips -- this isn't a secret. When I was a teacher I saw their Mandarin classes and Chinese dance classes first hand. Yes, they are regarded as 'spies' but all they are really doing is encouraging kids to think favourably about China. Anything political they say goes hilariously over the heads of the kids. The teachers are also relentlessly nice (oh how dare they), so really the enduring message they deliver is "Chinese people are nice." I don't have a massive problem with that. 

  • 2 weeks later...

Thanks Shaggy, I know my son is not really interested- and there's a ton of press regarding CI's in the UK- but all the same, they (CI employees) are contractually obliged to report on Chinese nationals living abroad if deemed to display any 'anti CCP' behaviour- this could have serious consequences for anyone deemed 'dissident' or their families at home in China. Not so nice. CIs are part of China's 'Soft Power' approach; propaganda, spying, reporting and exerting their influence abroad-  We'll see how things go this year as the UK is defunding the CI's- shame Sunak U turned on an outright ban- but the thing to think of is how would we feel if it was a fascist state running language programs for our kids? They would be shut down in a heartbeat. I don't see why China gets a pass when it is guilty of  ethnic cleansing, mass detention, human rights abuses etc.  Plus our schools seem to welcome them with open arms, it beggars belief. Anyway, here are some links if anyone interested in further research....

Emplyoment application for CI teacher abroad:

https://ukctransparency.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/STANDARD-FORM-National-Application-Form-for-Teachers-Going-Overseas-1.pdf

more gen info:

https://ukctransparency.org/projects-2/are-confucius-institutes-legal/

 

Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/apr/24/uk-stop-funding-chinese-confucius-institute-mandarin-teaching-schools

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...