Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I hope everyone watches this on itv and itvx.

We think we have royal mail problems on East Dulwich but this drama and it's fellow documentary highlights one of the biggest miscarriages of justice in recent years.   The lives of many postmasters and their families were ruined by the arrogance of those in charge at Post Office and their attempts to cover up their faulty new IT system.  The compensation process for those who are still alive is an over complex sham to avoid properly compensating those that were hurt by this scandalous miscarriage of justice (if true compensation is even truly possible).  Those in power at the post office and the IT company should hang their heads in shame and they and the government should be doing everything they can to try to properly compensate the poor victims of this scandal.

If you are not already aware of this scandal do watch it on ITV and weep.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/338989-mr-bates-vs-the-post-office/
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moovart said:

We think we have royal mail problems on East Dulwich but this drama and it's fellow documentary highlights one of the biggest miscarriages of justice in recent years. 

To be fair, Royal Mail and The Post Office are, now, and managerially were,  then, different entities. The people responsible for cocking up our mail delivery had no responsibility  for sub post offices or indeed main post offices. 

  • Like 3

I was going to refer you to Theresa May's recent book "The Abuse of Power: Confronting Injustice in Public Life", sadly as the Guardian notes she doesn't include that scandal (or her own failings) www.theguardian.com/books/2023/sep/03/the-abuse-of-power-confronting-injustice-in-public-life-by-theresa-may-review-blind-to-her-own-failings

To be fair to her it is probably relevant to the discussions here, and how government failed to act, or put things in the slow lane.

1 hour ago, jazzer said:

so why mention it if it's irrelevant to the discussion, oh, another opportunity to whip the Govt................

If you are referring to Malumbu's post, perhaps you should re-read his last paragraph .....  Unless I have misunderstood it (quite likely 🤣 )

On 02/01/2024 at 21:16, Penguin68 said:

To be fair, Royal Mail and The Post Office are, now, and managerially were,  then, different entities. The people responsible for cocking up our mail delivery had no responsibility  for sub post offices or indeed main post offices. 

When did the post office become Royal Mail?
 
As part of the Postal Services Act 2000, the businesses of the Post Office were transferred in 2001 to a public limited company, Consignia plc, which was quickly renamed Royal Mail Holdings plc. The government became the sole shareholder in Royal Mail Holdings plc and its subsidiary Post Office Ltd.
The two companies were part of the same group until 2012, when the Post Office was split out into a separate business.
So they were one company when this scandal started and Adam Crozier, CEO during many years of the scandal and now ITV CEO is conspicuous by his absence in the drama doc.
Mr Crozier was CEO of Royal Mail Group between 2003 and 2010, when the Post Office was part of it and subpostmasters were being pursued through the courts.
Fujitsu have also come off lightly when it was their IT fault that caused the problem and it took years before anyone there said anything 
Remember that it's individuals within large organisations and government that make these decisions and choose not to own up and allow the wrong thing to happen.  The individuals have the protection of the large organisation but it is individual people with power who choose to do the wrong thing and screw the little person.
 
 
 
 
 

 

In 1986, Royal Mail was split into Royal Mail Letters, Royal Mail Parcels, and Post Office Counters. In 1987, Post Office Counters Ltd became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Royal Mail and then in 2001, Post Office Counters Ltd became a public limited company and was renamed Post Office Ltd.

 

 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Oh, so that was the council.  Someone ripped some lovely flowering Toadflax from our wall and threw it in the gutter.  I assumed that a child had done it.  How strange?
    • Black open bag found on pavement on Goodrich Road this morning filled with electrical type items. Please message me if yours with description of what should be inside. Thanks
    • Every year council workers come round and remove "weeds" from pavements. These "weeds" are wild flowers which as well as brightening up the urban environment attract pollinating insects including bees. Can someone explain to me what is the purpose of this removal? The plants do not seem to be causing any kind of obstruction to pedestrians, and they make my walks around the area more pleasant. Or had done. It seems a bit odd that on the one hand the council are deliberately planting areas of wild flowers (eg on Goose Green, albeit not apparently maintaining them very well) and/or apparently letting previously cultivated areas go wild (eg on Goose Green roundabout) but on the other hand they are paying employees to come round and remove wild flowers. Why? Am I missing something here? I came out the other day to find a small pile of flowering  Toadflax and Alkanet outside my house. I was totally bemused until a neighbour told me the reason.
    • Have you changed your mind about taking the task on which Monica used to do, then?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...