Jump to content

Recommended Posts

There's currently no signage on the busy side of Denmark Hill station. Thameslink claim the signage on Champion Park is 'clear and obvious', despite there not being any 🤔

I've started a petition if anyone is inclined to sign: https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/thameslink-to-add-signage-outside-denmark-hill-station

I had an issue years ago and my MP was reasonably engaged.  He wrote a separate PS at the end of the letter, so definitely didn't rely on a stock letter.  Need to test out the current one out on some other rail related stuff.  If you are unhappy with Thameslink then go to the ombudsman.  My issues are with SWR, should lose their franchise, and GWR at station ticketing.  I'd love a single ticketing system across all providers 

Thanks - I've written to Harriet Harman, so hopefully she can do something. What annoys me the most is that it's clearly lacking, and they just don't care whether people can find the station or not. I live very near it and am asked all the time where the station is! 

There may be a problem here about authority - street furniture (i.e. signposts) are the remit of local authorities, not railway companies - and although Thameslink uses Denmark Hill is it actually 'their' station, or is it Network Rails? I suspect that the best that could be done by rail companies is to signpost actually on the station, which may be unnecessary if you've got that far.

I agree the signposting isn't good, but whose fault that may be is moot. And who must remedy it mooter.

So apparently it's up to Thameslink, but to add Overground signage (as they did on the other entrance) they have to work with TfL. When I contacted Thameslink, they flat out refused to countenance putting any signage up! Ultimately it's up to them

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I agree with your sentiment, however you are mistaken about the Dulwich Estate. Their sole purpose is to make as much money as possible to give to the schools they support, as well as the almshouses and other historical buildings. They do not care about social housing (except subsidised housing for teachers of the schools), refreshing the area, low-rent studios, charming but affordable pub, etc. While they are a charity, their purpose is very constrained/focused and whatever they do with this site, it has to make money for them. It's not that they're being nasty or stingy, it's just what their statutes tell them they have to do. Note that I am not defending them, but knowing the above helps understand why they do what they do, even if sometimes it seems to go against the wishes of the local community. They are not answerable to the local community, and their only oversight is the charity commission and the courts. And of course, like all bureaucracies (esp those with limited oversight), they look after themselves very well. 
    • Posting for a friend. Missing from The Gardens.   Amazingly found after 2 days just as I posted.  My powers are better than I thought!!!!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...