Jump to content

Reduced: Indoor table tennis table 3/4 size, green table top, with net, very good condition


Recommended Posts

  • IMG_3947.thumb.jpeg.deadfd2e9a2c12433f3933c1b139cc7e.jpegButterfly 3/4 size table tennis table, for all ages.
  • Ideal for those with limited space to play.
  • 12mm playing top
  • 3/4 size table
  • The top is protected by a steel frame and magenta corner pieces.
  • 2 separate halves
  • Legs fold in for storage
  • Two wheels on each half for easy movement
  • Stores away using minimal space.  
  • Approx. Dimensions:

    In use: 206 x 115 x 77cm. Storage: 107 x 115 x 8cm. 33kg
    This is the link to the table

https://www.mastersofgames.com/cat/table-tennis/butterfly-junior-compact-table.htm

Selling because no longer used. It is easy to transport or move to the side of the room, as it folds up and is on wheels. It is in very good condition.

Currently stored in my shed under plastic. Viewings welcome.

Collection Herne Hill. I think you will need a roof rack. 

£180 ono please. 

Thanks for looking

Edited by Up00cycled
Now £100
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • Up00cycled changed the title to Reduced: Indoor table tennis table 3/4 size, green table top, with net, very good condition
  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I believe around 57% of the 5,538 people who were part of the self selecting sample making up the original consultation, opposed the LTN. So just over 3,000 people. This was around 3 years ago now. I think there’s something like 40,000+ living across se22 and SE21 🤷‍♂️  The LTN is a minority interest at best. Whilst it’s an obsession for a small number on the transport thread who strongly oppose it, most have quietly accepted the changes and I suspect consider them to be something of an improvement.
    • Okay Earl, of those 'consulted' how many voices were in favour of the junction and how many against? Were there more responses in favour or more against? This local junction change is being driven by Southwark Labour Councillors- not as you assert by Central Govt. Also, if consultations are so irrelevant as indicators of meaningful local support in the way you seem to imply, why do organisations like Southwark Cyclists constantly ask their members to respond to all and any consultation on LTN's and CPZ's?  
    • You could apply the same argument to any kind of penalty as an effective deterrent.  Better than doing nothing. 
    • Check the link I provided above. It’s gives a very full account of where the push for LTNs came from, (in brief, central government). The consultation did not show that the majority of local residents were against the LTN. Not for the first time, you’ve confused a ‘consultation’ with a ‘referendum’. The outcome of local elections (which many opposed to LTNs excitedly promoted as a referendum on the scheme), suggested they are actually quite popular. All the polling on LTNs generally, also shows majority support across London.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...