Jump to content

Rhythmic gymnastics - East Dulwich


ingava

Recommended Posts

Rhythmic gymnastics - we have a few spaces available in our Recreational groups (learning basic elements in Rhyhmic gymnastics, apparatus skills with hoop, ball, skipping rope, ribbon, clubs, some dance and acrobatic elements) :

  • For 10-12 year old girls on Mondays, 6-8pm, at the Charter School ED. (During school exams: 5-7pm, at Harris Girls)
  • For 7-8 year old girls on Wednesdays, 5-7pm, at the Charter School ED. (During school exams: at Newlands Academy)
  • For 9-10 year old girls on Fridays, 5-7pm, at the Charter School ED. (During school exams: at Newlands Academy)

Let us know if you're interested! email: [email protected]      www.gymnasticselegance.co.uk 

lgse_training_february23- (26 of 141).jpg

 

lgse_training_february23-(1of141).thumb.jpg.aab3d727126a3c8fc39270c3f886e4d3.jpg

reklamai2.JPG

  • 3 weeks later...

Our Recreational Programme designed for everyone, who is just starting out in the sport, as well as those with some experience in gymnastics. Recreational classes are designed to improve hand-eye coordination, body control, spatial awareness, memory, and concentration. It will also teach elements of the beginning of rhythmic gymnastics such as flexibility, basic acrobatics, and apparatus handling.

  • 4 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Has anyone from the school commented? Have they said why? Is it a fresh start? Is it that Grove in the name may have connotations of wealth and they want to attract more applicants from a wider area? Is that it currently is linked to the DKH Estate? 
    • As you quite rightly say a sample of 500 is extremely  small. (actually unrepresentative in the scheme of things) Now corbyn has his own party or should that be Party, it'll be interesting to see if it is merely a "think tank" or if it contests seats and then if they win any and if they chase currently held seats by Labour. It'll be even more amusing if it unseats current Labour Ministers though.   
    • First of all, conversations with people who aren't Corbyn supporters are obviously going to tell you why those people didn't vote for him, aren't they? Second (and I don't know why I have to keep on saying this) the electoral system worked against him in terms of seats lost. If you look at the actual numbers of votes per party, yes Labour was behind, but not by as much as it appeared if just seats were counted. Thirdly, that poll was of "nearly 500" people who stopped voting Labour. That's not a very big sample, is it? Of those, 35% said it was because of Jeremy Corbyn's leadership (i.e. 65% had other reasons). Even upping the numbers to  500 people, 35% is 175. 10,269,051  people did actually vote Labour in that election. It's a long time since I used statistics for anything, so please correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think anything you have said is "evidence"!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...