Jump to content

Recommended Posts

On 15/03/2024 at 09:16, Rockets said:

No but that was the suggestion. Given your role as part of the cycle lobby are you aware of any cycleways that have been paused in Southwark?

 

I can assure you I didn't read it in a One Dulwich post or Tory leaflet and nor am I making it up. 

 

Glad you are acknowledging that the council could well have had to reign back certain projects because their revenue projection changed due to their inability to roll-out borough-wide CPZs. They clearly thought the CPZ was a shoe-in because they signed the contract with APCOA on the basis of them rolling it out - again another item that will be causing a deficit elsewhere now it isn't recouping the revenue.

 

0/10 for deflection tactics Rockets.   Also noting still no source...  

  • Like 1
17 hours ago, Spartacus said:

That's a good point Trinidad 

Roads across the Borough seem to have the worst potholes in years despite it being a mild winter so the council can't blame it on freezing and thawing damage. 

Why hasn't the extra cash generated through CPZs and LTNs been used to repair the roads? 

With the amount of revenue raised, which should be reserved for road based projects, one would almost expect tje streets to be paved with gold 🤣 

Therefore why are the potholes worse thos year which is a danger for motorists and cyclists alike ? 

Not just roads but pavements too. Paving on NX already looking shabby and in places a trip hazard; ditto other local streets. Could some of that money be used for maintenance of street trees? Perhaps that is already happening? The other thought is fly-tipping on street corners?

Ah - i see you've gone from trying to deflect with word twisting, to just deflecting with some kind of weird attempt at belittling. 

 

Its ok - just post the source of the 'thing that you heard that definitely wasn't from a crank group or some kind of desperate leaflet from the local unelected Tories.

  • Haha 1

Going back to the question on potholes and why fines / fees raised via schemes like CPZs or LTNs aren't being used to fix them, this article was on the bbc today: 

BBC News - Potholes: Roads in England and Wales at 'breaking point'
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-68598875

Question is where is all the money going, obviously not fixing potholes with it. 🤔

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • From what I have gathered from Bradbury Oak residents  I have spoken with, that at a meeting with RNIB earlier in the year, none of the residents were in favour of new build. There is the implication that rent rises are anticipated to help towards building costs. Rent is currently in the region of £300 pw - as with most sheltered housing (council and Housing Association), Since these rents also include maintenance charges, utility charges - Housing Benefit is only applicable to the actual 'rent element' per flat.
    • At the Dulwich Hill SNT meeting last night we spoke about Met. Engage. Dulwich Hill had signed up 185 households. Scheme  had been trialled in other parts of the country successfully and now the Met. Police are rolling it out, To the end of August, the Met Police had gathered 17,000 registrations which equites to 2% of households.
    • Personally, I think the death sentance should be brought back for anyone found to be harming animals. 
    • When you dig into the site, there's an ancillary domain also involved in the system: neighbourhoodalert.co.uk;  and one pointed to by the latter as an example, stayintheknow.co.uk, which seems to have been set up by Lancashire.  All three long validated by Nominet and with same registrar.    metengage_etc_whois.txt
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...